republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » O Canada! » Canadian » TekSavvy » We're not endorsing internet throttling: CRTC
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
Post a:
Post a:
Availability Contradictions? »
« Dumping Bell Home Phone Because Of CRTC ruling  
AuthorAll Replies
-


Sal6489649

@utoronto.ca

reply to shikotee
Re: We're not endorsing internet throttling: CRTC

Better still.

Read Lennie Katz (Who made the comment above):

"Prior to assuming those responsibilities, he spent 17 years within the Rogers Group of Companies, where he held various positions in the regulatory, intercarrier services and business development fields of wireless and cable services. This experience led to the position of President, Rogers Business Solutions, which he occupied until 2001. From 1974 to 1985, he acted in increasingly senior capacities at Bell Canada, including as Assistant Director of Policy Development and Regulatory Affairs."


shikotee

join:2007-01-11
Toronto, ON
·TekSavvy Solutions..
·Bell Sympatico

reply to Stewy
said by Stewy See Profile :

"the CRTC's vice-chairman said Thursday after the federal watchdog ruled Bell Canada was not breaking laws by slowing down certain uses of the internet."

more proof that the CRTC is in Bell's pocket
Not at all. This is proof that the current laws need to be amended so that they are more favorable towards consumers, and not big business!

Have you looked at the CRTC chairman's bio?

»www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/about/vfinckenstein.htm

No doubt, he has a strong background with regards to how current laws deal with these matters. Sadly, in all fairness, if it was their job to interpret the law, then they likely made the right decision.

No doubt, Bell had spent lots of $$ researching and making sure that what they were doing would stand up, from a legal perspective.

For me, what bothers me the most is why it took so long for this decision to be reached....
Forums » O Canada! » Canadian » TekSavvyAvailability Contradictions? »
« Dumping Bell Home Phone Because Of CRTC ruling  


Wednesday, 09-Dec 08:27:33 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [195] Sprint Sued For Distracted Driving Death
· [81] 3G Network Test Says AT&T Is Tops
· [72] Mediacom Unveils 105 Mbps Pricing
· [62] Sprint Poised For A Turnaround?
· [53] WPA Cracker: Test WPA-PSK Networks In 20 Minutes
· [50] The Future Of Wi-Fi Is Bright
· [47] Site Leaks Yahoo, Verizon Fed Data Share Pricing
· [44] Microwaving Your Innards Is Not 'Extreme'
· [39] Verizon LTE: 5-12 Mbps Downstream
· [21] AT&T Releases Network Reporting iPhone App
Most people now reading
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Comcast refused to install 400' feet. [Comcast HSI]
· [How to] Install Asterisk on an Asus WL-520GU router [VOIP Tech Chat]
· HOA Headaches [General Questions]
· Extjs grid combo box. [Webmasters and Developers]
· IMG 1.7 (IMG Updates and Discussion) [Verizon FIOS TV]
· CRTC Response to ME: You will be Band F FOREVER!!! [TekSavvy]
· Is sleeping similar to being dead? [General Questions]
· buffs, nerfs, and 3.3 [World of Warcraft]
· So what addons will likely not work... [World of Warcraft]