<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;That&#x27;s Funny&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Thats-Funny-21462289</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:50:24 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:50:24 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: That&#x27;s Funny</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Thats-Funny-21462912</link>
<description><![CDATA[espaeth posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/381367" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=381367');">damonlab</a>:</small><br><br>If population more condensed = greater access to high speed connections, why don't we have 100+ MB connections in NYC, ATL, DET, SAN, SEA, CHI, LAX, BOS, etc?</div>It's a combination of multiple factors.<br><br>1) Population density<br>2) Government built telecom (NTT Japan was government built, still partially government owned.  Similar situation in South Korea)<br>2) Investors willing to take on long term (30+ year) debt<br><br>Within the US cities you mentioned you'll still find pockets of places with better access.  A friend of mine lives in NYC and his building provides 100mbps Ethernet access to all of the condos.  Out on the west coast you have services like <A HREF="http://www.paxio.com">Paxio</a>.<br><br>It's not that the services don't exist in the US -- they're just not widespread.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Thats-Funny-21462912</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:43:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: That&#x27;s Funny</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Thats-Funny-21462810</link>
<description><![CDATA[damonlab posted : If population more condensed = greater access to high speed connections, why don't we have 100+ MB connections in NYC, ATL, DET, SAN, SEA, CHI, LAX, BOS, etc?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Thats-Funny-21462810</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:29:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: That&#x27;s Funny</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Thats-Funny-21462670</link>
<description><![CDATA[baineschile posted : When you look at the other countries on the list (with the exception of Sweeden really) most of the countries are quite small, therefore the population is more condensed, and everything is easier to wire. Its tough and not-money smart for US-ISPs to get broadband to rural folks in wyoming]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Thats-Funny-21462670</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:09:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: That&#x27;s Funny</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Thats-Funny-21462526</link>
<description><![CDATA[morbo posted : your poor ear!  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Thats-Funny-21462526</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 10:47:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>That&#x27;s Funny</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Thats-Funny-21462289</link>
<description><![CDATA[Mr Matt posted :  :D Every time I pay my broadband bill I feel like I am being penetrated by my ISP. You know where.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Thats-Funny-21462289</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 10:10:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

