 81399672Premium
join:2006-05-17
Los Angeles, CA
kudos:2 | A good day inded Time to put middle man out of business. Why would a company want to support other businesses when those business are direct competition. This was good ruling by Canadian regulators
--
i am not a lawyer but I do play one on the internet |
|
Reviews:
 ·magicjack.com
| said by 81399672:Time to put middle man out of business. Why would a company want to support other businesses when those business are direct competition. This was good ruling by Canadian regulators It seems like Canadians aren't addressing the real issue. One company is both the sole supplier to other companies, and competes with them. It should be forced to restructure to eliminate that conflict of interest. Focusing on anything else seems to miss the point.
Mark |
|
| Everybody write your mp, I did. Also a new thing on the horizon something good to look at just google it 
BILL C-552
Bell and rogers are gonna lobby hard against it of course. |
|
rosenquiPremium
join:2004-05-28
Kanata, ON | reply to 81399672
said by 81399672:Why would a company want to support other businesses when those business are direct competition. Therein lies the problem for Canadians. Bell does not *want* to support their wholesale customers, but the regulators have said that they must since Bell manages the last mile and had a regulation-supported monopoly on the last mile until relatively recently.
As taxpayers and consumers we'd be a lot better off if ownership and control of the last mile infrastructure were partitioned off into a separate company that sold the wholesale access to everyone. That's essentially what we have now, except that the relationship between the last mile portion of Bell and the retail portion (their Sympatico ISP) is nowhere near arms-length. |
|
