<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Misleading Press in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r21488776</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 23:34:46 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 23:34:46 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Misleading Press</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21491437</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/887660"><b>hottboiinnc</b></A> : i know how it works. <br><br>The article basically states that DSL from Sonic.net & ATT do not experience the same speed issues as Comcast because Comcast uses coaxial and Sonic.net and ATT use copper.<br><br>Well actually if they knew anything both experience speed issues is what i meant.  Thus you should have realized that.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21491437</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 00:07:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Misleading Press</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21489311</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/993987"><b>dynodb</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  hottboiinnc <A HREF="/useremail/u/887660"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>But Comcast has faced criticism from broadband analysts who say its network is overloaded and slows down during peak hours. Because AT&T and Sonic.net use copper wires -- not coaxial cable -- they don't experience the same type of congestion.<br><br>that quote from &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.pressdemocrat.com/article/20081019/NEWS/810190340" >www.pressdemocrat.com/article/20&middot;&middot;&middot;10190340</A> is misleading.  ALL Internet faces congestion just not cable.<br><br>But what to except from a DSL issued news story.  DSL Providers only tell half the truth which is generally a lie to begin with.<br> </div>Congestion has absolutely nothing to do with the medium delivering a broadband connection.<br><br>That said, the congestion does tend to occur in different places (namely upstream vs downstream of the node) with DSL or cable, and thus one may have an easier and/or more cost effective resolution than the other.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21489311</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 16:25:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Misleading Press</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21488776</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/887660"><b>hottboiinnc</b></A> : But Comcast has faced criticism from broadband analysts who say its network is overloaded and slows down during peak hours. Because AT&T and Sonic.net use copper wires -- not coaxial cable -- they don't experience the same type of congestion.<br><br>that quote from &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.pressdemocrat.com/article/20081019/NEWS/810190340" >www.pressdemocrat.com/article/20&middot;&middot;&middot;10190340</A> is misleading.  ALL Internet faces congestion just not cable.<br><br>But what to except from a DSL issued news story.  DSL Providers only tell half the truth which is generally a lie to begin with.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21488776</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 14:44:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
