<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Pay Back.&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Pay-Back-21497427</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:46:30 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:46:30 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Pay Back.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Pay-Back-21497427</link>
<description><![CDATA[CableGei posted : I believe this is mainly about damage incurred from U-Verse installations on the customer's premesis, such as house boxes broken into in order to access coax (debatable, as this becomes the customer's property), improper hookups resulting in noise being injected into TWC's plant, MDU lock boxes being broken into to access coax, TWC customers getting disconnected as a result of inexperienced U-Verse Premises Techs attempting to tone out and locate outlets within MDU lock boxes, "stealing" the bond/ground equipment, improper hookup resulting in TWC services not working within the home (for homes that have both at&t and TWC services).<br><br>It basically the same things that the phone companies whined about when cable companies entered the phone business... it's just the other way around now.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Pay-Back-21497427</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 14:46:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

