republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » New UDP uTorrent Takes Aim At Throttling » Is this a good thing for the net?
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
« Multicast is GOOD, write for it today...  
devnuller

join:2006-06-10
Hollis, NH

Re: Is this a good thing for the net?

said by a333 See Profile :

I've said over an over, the ideal solution is to gracefully scale back speed for ANY upload/download if the said user is using their full bandwidth for more than 20 minutes during peak hours. This actually solves the problem, unlike throttling schemes like bell's, which render many legitimate applications useless.
Like this? »www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=···NA18k1dY

a333
A hot cup of integrals please

join:2007-06-12
Rego Park, NY
·Cingular Wireless
·Verizon Online DSL

Re: Is this a good thing for the net?

Yep, Comcast's "protocol agnostic" approach is EXACTLY what I was talking about, hence the reason I mentioned them in my original post..
To amigo_boy, QoS can be enabled on many different levels. Per se, many Vonage routers let you slow down ALL your internet traffic in general, to make sure your VoIP is clear/reliable. Many download managers let you put a cap on download speeds/time that stuff is downloaded. I don't see anything special about BitTorrent/P2P. What's your point?

amigo_boy

join:2005-07-22
Tempe, AZ
·Cox HSI
·magicjack.com

Re: Is this a good thing for the net?

said by a333 See Profile :

To amigo_boy, ... What's your point?
I was just responding to the assertion that all bandwidth is equal. That's not true. Even torrent users apply traffic shaping via QoS because they don't want their torrents disrupting their own interactive applications.

I see nothing wrong with applying the same common sense further upstream. Maybe ISPs aren't doing that in the best way. I don't know what they do, or what the alternatives are. But, just claiming that all bandwidth is equal is incorrect.

Mark
Skippy25

join:2000-09-13
Hazelwood, MO

Re: Is this a good thing for the net?

To the ISP, yes it should be as they should be nothing but the dumbpipes they are passing packets along the network.

The rest will work itself out with the law of physics, congestion, and consumers willingness to deal with it.
Forums » New UDP uTorrent Takes Aim At Throttling« Multicast is GOOD, write for it today...  


Wednesday, 09-Dec 05:18:03 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [194] Sprint Sued For Distracted Driving Death
· [81] 3G Network Test Says AT&T Is Tops
· [72] Mediacom Unveils 105 Mbps Pricing
· [62] Sprint Poised For A Turnaround?
· [50] The Future Of Wi-Fi Is Bright
· [50] WPA Cracker: Test WPA-PSK Networks In 20 Minutes
· [47] Site Leaks Yahoo, Verizon Fed Data Share Pricing
· [44] Microwaving Your Innards Is Not 'Extreme'
· [39] Verizon LTE: 5-12 Mbps Downstream
· [21] AT&T Releases Network Reporting iPhone App
Most people now reading
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· ICC Strats??? [World of Warcraft]
· [How to] Install Asterisk on an Asus WL-520GU router [VOIP Tech Chat]
· buffs, nerfs, and 3.3 [World of Warcraft]
· Microsoft Security Bulletin(s) for December 8, 2009 [Security]
· [WIN7] Outlook express under Windows 7? [Microsoft Help]
· persistent connection to qw-in-f113.1e100.net on boot [Security]
· Tomato/MLPPP v3 alpha 6 released! [TekSavvy]
· Comcast refused to install 400' feet. [Comcast HSI]
· Using DIR-615 C1/3.01 with Trendnet TEW-652BRP in N Mode [D-Link]