<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>[General] Virtual Number for Forwarding Only in VOIP Tech Chat</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r21507931</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 21:23:36 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 21:23:36 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: [General] Virtual Number for Forwarding Only</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21547813</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1301123"><b>kieranmullen</b></A> : Once you get an account login to the website to [purchase a number.<br><br>When logged in using the software I think you enter  ** to get your number.  Their KB article about getting the # from the profile does not work for me for some reason.<br><br>Let us know how it works out for you.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21547813</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 14:33:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [General] Virtual Number for Forwarding Only</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21546284</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1572525"><b>PX Eliezer</b></A> : For Gizmo5, you need to download the software first, to your computer or to your cellphone:<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://gizmo5.com/pc/download/" >gizmo5.com/pc/download/</A><br>(When you go to that page, it pops up with an executable download.  I suggest that you CANCEL that download executable, so that you can take your time picking the right download for your needs!  Don't blame me, blame Gizmo!)<br><br>(By the way, if anyone wants to use an ATA instead of computer softphone, they can do that after downloading the software.  But the software has to be downloaded and installed in order to get the account number and such).<br><br>After you are setup with Gizmo, you can purchase a Call-In number:<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://gizmo5.com/pc/network/callin-numbers/" >gizmo5.com/pc/network/callin-numbers/</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21546284</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 10:23:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [General] Virtual Number for Forwarding Only</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21546174</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Hello kieranmullen and thanks for your response. I tried going on Gizmoproject.com but I couldn't figure out where to sign up for a number. Their rate of $35 per year works for me. I only need it for incoming calls since all calls will be routed t my cell phone. Can you please send me a link to the sign up page? Thanks in advance.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21546174</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 09:59:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [General] Virtual Number for Forwarding Only</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21526560</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1532944"><b>nitzan</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  soitgoes2 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1140228"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  nitzan <A HREF="/useremail/u/1532944"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br>Verizon used to do flat-rate pricing on their DIDs until yesterday. As of yesterday their incoming-only DIDs are now billed per-minute, in essence they matched Level 3.  </div>Are they applying this to DIDs that are already in service or just newly acquired DIDs?<br>Did they lower the monthly fee at the same time?<br> </div>They're applying it to all DIDs including ones purchased under the former terms. In essence what they're saying is deal with it - or stop using the service. I would not be surprised to see lawsuits against them because many companies were depending on a product they decided to discontinue on a whim. Very bad business practices on this one.<br><br>I haven't done extensive research, but at this point it's possible that Level 3 pricing is lower than Verizon.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21526560</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 12:20:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [General] Virtual Number for Forwarding Only</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21526457</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1364139"><b>VOIPoTim</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  kieranmullen <A HREF="/useremail/u/1301123"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>About per minute charges for incoming fax lines...<br><br>How does the same user base view per minute charges as an entirely new concept even for incoming calls.  Even the seeminly telephony backwards UK that charges per minute for local calls, only charges the caller and not the reciever. Now I am aware that the US telecom system is varied in such a way that it would be expensive and difficult to set up a similar billing system (people might riot as well) However I find it hard that a company (Gizmo) that has recently requested people add funds to their account to get personal service (which is fair) is eating the cost of incoming calls.  I then assume that it either 1)Costs them nothing or 2)They obtain kickbacks for terminating calls For voicepulse.com (I forgot to mention I can also get 4 unlimited incomming lines at $11 per month. I doubt they are eating that cost too)<br><br>So for larger companies (I do not know if they are bigger) Yourself, Viatalk  etc.  I then assume that you are getting paid twice to terminate the same call?  Once by the carrier and then another time for the customer, not only paying for it, but as I mentieond earlier above market rates.<br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  VOIPoTim <A HREF="/useremail/u/1364139"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br>We designed it mainly because our target audience for it within our existing customer base doesn't know much about VoIP and would only be using it to forward to PSTN numbers anyway so consolidating it was better than billing for both inbound and outbound legs from a marketing standpoint.<br> </div> </div>Hi Kieran,<br><br>The fax service has no per minute charge.<br><br>For the Express Local service, it includes 300 minutes each month and then there is a charge.  Since we bundle the PSTN forwarding with it, there's no difference in this vs any other service out there.<br><br>As an example, if you got a DID from Future Nine, they'd charge if you forwarded it to the PSTN, so it's really the same thing, just marketed differently.  <br><br>We found that people responded better to it being marketed this way rather than stating 2 prices (incoming and forwarding) when nearly 100% of our customers were forwarding to PSTN.<br><br>Hope that makes sense.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21526457</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 12:03:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [General] Virtual Number for Forwarding Only</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21526339</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1140228"><b>soitgoes2</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  nitzan <A HREF="/useremail/u/1532944"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Verizon used to do flat-rate pricing on their DIDs until yesterday. As of yesterday their incoming-only DIDs are now billed per-minute, in essence they matched Level 3.  </div>Are they applying this to DIDs that are already in service or just newly acquired DIDs?<br>Did they lower the monthly fee at the same time?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21526339</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 11:42:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [General] Virtual Number for Forwarding Only</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21525011</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1532944"><b>nitzan</b></A> : Correct. Pretty much all CLECs that service VoIP make you pay for incoming minutes. Some like L3 make you pay per-minute, while others make you buy "channels" where you have for example a dedicated virtual T1. If your call volume is high you'd need to buy additional T1 blocks so in essence you're paying per-minute - although the price is lower than L3 overall.<br><br>Verizon used to do flat-rate pricing on their DIDs until yesterday. As of yesterday their incoming-only DIDs are now billed per-minute, in essence they matched Level 3. This is a very bad thing for providers that relied on their flat rate pricing, but per-minute pricing is low enough on average where this might not have much of an impact for residential customers. They still sell two-way DIDs where you get unlimited incoming and local outgoing - but those cost too much to consider for most customers IMHO.<br><small>--<br>Nitzan Kon, CEO<br>Future Nine Corporation</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21525011</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 05:15:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [General] Virtual Number for Forwarding Only</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21524666</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1140228"><b>soitgoes2</b></A> : Level3 is one of the big providers of DIDs to VOIP providers. I believe they charge, at least in most cases, for incoming calls.<br><br>At the other end of the spectrum, MagicJack supposedly, as a CLEC, does get paid for incoming calls to it.<br><br>In the middle, you've got "flat rate" providers where incoming calls aren't charged to the VoIP provider or the end-user. Someone does get paid, but that doesn't mean the VoIP provider sees any of it.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21524666</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 01:04:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [General] Virtual Number for Forwarding Only</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21524621</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1301123"><b>kieranmullen</b></A> : About per minute charges for incoming fax lines...<br><br>How does the same user base view per minute charges as an entirely new concept even for incoming calls.  Even the seeminly telephony backwards UK that charges per minute for local calls, only charges the caller and not the reciever. Now I am aware that the US telecom system is varied in such a way that it would be expensive and difficult to set up a similar billing system (people might riot as well) However I find it hard that a company (Gizmo) that has recently requested people add funds to their account to get personal service (which is fair) is eating the cost of incoming calls.  I then assume that it either 1)Costs them nothing or 2)They obtain kickbacks for terminating calls For voicepulse.com (I forgot to mention I can also get 4 unlimited incomming lines at $11 per month. I doubt they are eating that cost too)<br><br>So for larger companies (I do not know if they are bigger) Yourself, Viatalk  etc.  I then assume that you are getting paid twice to terminate the same call?  Once by the carrier and then another time for the customer, not only paying for it, but as I mentieond earlier above market rates.<br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  VOIPoTim <A HREF="/useremail/u/1364139"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>We designed it mainly because our target audience for it within our existing customer base doesn't know much about VoIP and would only be using it to forward to PSTN numbers anyway so consolidating it was better than billing for both inbound and outbound legs from a marketing standpoint.<br> </div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21524621</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 00:52:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [General] Virtual Number for Forwarding Only</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21524468</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1552712"><b>edmidor</b></A> : didww.com has 305 codes, unlimited]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21524468</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 00:06:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [General] Virtual Number for Forwarding Only</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21523768</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1572525"><b>PX Eliezer</b></A> : Also further thinking about this---if this is for business-type use, may want to look at:<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.ringcentral.com/" >www.ringcentral.com/</A><br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.phonefusionone.com/" >www.phonefusionone.com/</A><br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.phone.com/virtual-office/" >www.phone.com/virtual-office/</A><br><br>The first two are pretty well known, the third one has somehow not made a splash. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21523768</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 21:40:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [General] Virtual Number for Forwarding Only</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21523670</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1572525"><b>PX Eliezer</b></A> : Nothing against Brring! but folks do need to be familiar with Terms of Service:<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.brring.com/tos.php" >www.brring.com/tos.php</A><br><br>especially this part:<br><br>4. TERM AND TERMINATION The Beta Test is expected to run for several months, ending upon Brring!'s notice, though either party may terminate this Agreement at any time for any reason by notifying the other. Upon termination Your access to the Service and use of the Brring! Number will end.....<br><br>So take note:<br><br>With a free ad-supported Beta<br>They can run and say See Ya Later!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21523670</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 21:22:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [General] Virtual Number for Forwarding Only</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21522996</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/637921"><b>mazilo</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  nitzan <A HREF="/useremail/u/1532944"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  mazilo <A HREF="/useremail/u/637921"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br>It also has 818 (Hawaii) area code!</div>Did you mean 808? :) (818 is LA)</div>Nitza, you are right and it is 808 (not 818). Sorry about that error.<br><small>--<br>Mazilo always prays for FREEBIES!<br>US Phone: +1-678-601-0907<br>UK Phone: +44-703-194-2574<br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21522996</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 19:28:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [General] Virtual Number for Forwarding Only</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21522942</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : why not use www.magicjack.com    it is cheap and can be used anywhere in the us and canada]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21522942</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 19:20:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [General] Virtual Number for Forwarding Only</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21522687</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1532944"><b>nitzan</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  mazilo <A HREF="/useremail/u/637921"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>It also has 818 (Hawaii) area code!</div>Did you mean 808? :) (818 is LA)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21522687</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 18:34:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [General] Virtual Number for Forwarding Only</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21521509</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/637921"><b>mazilo</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by kissangelo :</small><br><br>Hello everyone. I need a number in the Southeast FL area (preferably 305) that I can set up to have calls forwarded to my cellphone, office, or home. I appreciate any suggestions or ideas.</div>Any suggestions? Then, try <A HREF="http://brring.com">Brring</a>. It is an ad driven free incoming call forwarded to your designated number. You don't need an invitation to be a member of <A HREF="http://brring.com">Brring</a>; however, any existing <A HREF="http://brring.com">Brring</a> member can send you an invite to make $1/invitation. That said, if you create an account here, I can PM you a free <A HREF="http://brring.com">Brring</a> invitation. You will need to maintain at least one incoming call/month before your <A HREF="http://brring.com">Brring</a> line gets recycled into the pool for others to use.<br><br>Anyway, last I checked (about two months ago), <A HREF="http://brring.com">Brring</a> had 768 (Miami) and (305) Keys area codes. It also has 818 (Hawaii) area code!<br><small>--<br>Mazilo always prays for FREEBIES!<br>US Phone: +1-678-601-0907<br>UK Phone: +44-703-194-2574<br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21521509</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 15:09:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [General] Virtual Number for Forwarding Only</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21521327</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1364139"><b>VOIPoTim</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  kieranmullen <A HREF="/useremail/u/1301123"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Does the user get charges for outgoing only or incoming and outgoing?  I would imagine the 300 minutes are apart of the above answer.<br><br>Gizmo has unlimited incoming and .02 per min outgoing.  Why should USA long distance cost more?  From voicepulse.com USA long distance cost at or less than .01 per minute.<br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  ilhy <A HREF="/useremail/u/1286498"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Voipo express local number.<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://voipo.com/local-voip-number.shtml" >voipo.com/local-voip-number.shtml</A><br> </div> </div>That includes incoming and outgoing PSTN forwarding.  It's a combined rate so it's a little different than most VoIP offerings out there.  We designed it mainly because our target audience for it within our existing customer base doesn't know much about VoIP and would only be using it to forward to PSTN numbers anyway so consolidating it was better than billing for both inbound and outbound legs from a marketing standpoint.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21521327</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 14:35:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [General] Virtual Number for Forwarding Only</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21521302</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1301123"><b>kieranmullen</b></A> : Does the user get charges for outgoing only or incoming and outgoing?  I would imagine the 300 minutes are apart of the above answer.<br><br>Gizmo has unlimited incoming and .02 per min outgoing.  Why should USA long distance cost more?  From voicepulse.com USA long distance cost at or less than .01 per minute.<br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  ilhy <A HREF="/useremail/u/1286498"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Voipo express local number.<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://voipo.com/local-voip-number.shtml" >voipo.com/local-voip-number.shtml</A><br> </div><br><small>--<br>KieranMullen                &raquo;<A HREF="http://360oregon.com" >360oregon.com</A> Betamax/Voipbuster Reseller &raquo;<A HREF="http://infocalls.net/vouchers" >infocalls.net/vouchers</A><br>IP/Website Tools            &raquo;<A HREF="http://ip.drlinky.com" >ip.drlinky.com</A></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21521302</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 14:29:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [General] Virtual Number for Forwarding Only</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21520179</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1286498"><b>ilhy</b></A> : Voipo express local number.<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://voipo.com/local-voip-number.shtml" >voipo.com/local-voip-number.shtml</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21520179</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 11:04:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [General] Virtual Number for Forwarding Only</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21519441</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1301123"><b>kieranmullen</b></A> : GizmoProject.com  has did's in the 305 area codefor $35 a year for unlimited incoming.  If you want to forward to another did you may do so but it will cost for outgoing minutes at .02 Which I am sure any carrier will charge you for as well. However you can have multiple registrations at once so you can always answer it at home when you are there for free.<br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by kissangelo :</small><br><br>Hello everyone. I need a number in the Southeast FL area (preferably 305) that I can set up to have calls forwarded to my cellphone, office, or home. I appreciate any suggestions or ideas. Also any info about Grand Central. Someone suggested it but I am not very familiar with it. Thanks in advance.<br> </div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21519441</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 08:14:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [General] Virtual Number for Forwarding Only</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21508005</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/266201"><b>gbh2o</b></A> : Two suggestions, depending on volume required and based on personal experience.  Both offer good [great?] flexibility in routing numbers just about anywhere you want.<br><br>VOIPo for lighter volume as mentioned above.  If you don't see a number in the area you need, ASK!  Very easy on-line management of 'immediate' routing changes.<br><br>Future-nine for potentially higher volume.  Takes a day or so to acquire a number and get it set up initially, but worth the wait.  ASK if you need something special.  Very easy on-line management of 'immediate' routing changes.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21508005</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 09:18:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [General] Virtual Number for Forwarding Only</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21507989</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/847262"><b>montyny</b></A> : I was looking for something similar - may not work for you but I went with Voicestick given that I didn't expect much volume.<br><br>There was another provider I almost went with &raquo;<A HREF="http://les.net/products/product_ipdidusa.php" >les.net/products/product_ipdidusa.php</A> but given the occasional use only, I went with Voicestick.<br> <br>Actually, just found this link: &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/DID+Service+Providers" >www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/DID+&middot;&middot;&middot;roviders</A> - might be worth looking through the list here.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21507989</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 09:13:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [General] Virtual Number for Forwarding Only</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21507964</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/635256"><b>UHF</b></A> : VOIPo looks like they offer that for around $3 a month.  300 minutes included.  Looks like a good deal.  I'd sign up, but they don't have any numbers where I need them.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21507964</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 09:07:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [General] Virtual Number for Forwarding Only</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21507956</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/115387"><b>dbmaven</b></A> : Grand Central is currently a closed Beta - they' aren't accepting any new accounts. You can read all about them at <br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.grandcentral.com" >www.grandcentral.com</A><br><br>If they were still accepting new accounts, they'd probably be a great alternative for you. Alas, you'll need to see what other options people offer up...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21507956</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 09:04:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>[General] Virtual Number for Forwarding Only</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21507931</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Hello everyone. I need a number in the Southeast FL area (preferably 305) that I can set up to have calls forwarded to my cellphone, office, or home. I appreciate any suggestions or ideas. Also any info about Grand Central. Someone suggested it but I am not very familiar with it. Thanks in advance.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21507931</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 08:55:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
