<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;my coax was removed&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/my-coax-was-removed-21508407</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:53:42 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:53:42 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>my coax was removed</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/my-coax-was-removed-21508407</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : when the att uverse guy came installed my uverse service he did rewire my house with cat5 nice bonus but later i found out he removed my coax that was installed under my house that was installed by the cable company many years ago. luckly I love my uverse service and would not switch back TWC because they are to expensive and the quality is no comparison. but I still believe they had no right to remove my coax. but the question is it my coax cable or TWC coax I did have to pay for the install many years ago so I believe I on it or if they do give you a free install they make you sign a contract for 2 years. so i believe I still on it I pay for it over 2 years of service. so the lawsuit should be the homeowner verses TWC and the companies they contract to install. sounds like a class action that more lawyers will get rich on and us consumers will get or $2.50 check for ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/my-coax-was-removed-21508407</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 10:44:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

