site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
224
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

utahluge

join:2004-10-14
Draper, UT

I plan on using it. :)

Well, I plan to make sure I come close to my 250 Gigs. I normally don't average that high but caps drive me nuts! Rather than averaging my lower numbers into their system, I plan on inflating my numbers to increase the average. I also encourage a lot of you to do the same thing.

1. It will bite them in the a** as all the sudden their numbers will go UP. Probably something they wouldn't expect.
2. If they keep the caps, it will most likely result in higher caps as the average will be much higher.

Bring on the encrypted torrents!!! ha ha ha

barmar

join:2008-05-29
Arlington, MA

said by utahluge:

Well, I plan to make sure I come close to my 250 Gigs. I normally don't average that high but caps drive me nuts!
It is NOT a cap, it's a threshold.

If you're below 250 GB, you will never be considered an excessive user. If you're above 250 GB and you're one of the heaviest users, you may receive an excessive use warning.

So all the posts about trying to hit 250 GB on the nose, or minimizing the reporting delay, are misguided. In practice, you'll almost certainly have to go far above 250 GB before you're actually considered an excessive user.

Comcast has been warning and terminating excessive users for years, this is not new. The only new thing is the 250 GB/mo threshold, below which you can be sure you're safe. It's still the case that you have no way of knowing how much you can really use before getting a warning, because it's dependent on the overall use of the network by other customers.

Friday, 01-Jun 00:46:21 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics