<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Odd figures in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r21526992</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 20:18:16 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 20:18:16 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Odd figures</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21526992</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1181003"><b>rcdailey</b></A> : In the chart, I see that they show different sources for the data on market share:  "Trending Schedules," "SEC 10-Q," and "Press Release."  The SEC 10-Q should be more authoritative than a press release, but it may also reflect a different period of time and that could be a cause for the discrepancy in the values for market share.  Also, only RoadRunner and AOL are shown with "Trending Schedules" as the source of data (because both come from Time Warner).  All this makes me not very trustful of the information.<br> ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21526992</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 13:23:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Odd figures</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21526901</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/851790"><b>a_large_rock</b></A> : From the chart...<br>Road Runner  8.4m 8.4% <br>Verizon      8.3m 8.7% <br>AOL          8.1m 8.9% <br><br>why is 8.1m 8.9% <br>and 8.4m only 8.4%?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21526901</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 13:09:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
