 Rattler
join:2001-04-13
Havertown, PA | Who's going to pay for it? So they get hit with a crapload of fines. Y'know where that money will eventually come from, don'tcha?
Everyone's already grousing about the increases in FiOS-TV charges slated for the beginning of next year. Instead of fining them, make them lower their charges in the allegedly affected areas while keeping other locales at the same levels.
--
Never raise your hands to your kids. It leaves your groin unprotected. -- Red Buttons |
|
 DarkLogixPremium
join:2008-10-23
Baytown, TX
kudos:3 | no just make them get FiOS out here |
|
 jmn1207Premium
join:2000-07-19
Ashburn, VA | reply to Rattler
said by Rattler:So they get hit with a crapload of fines. Y'know where that money will eventually come from, don'tcha? Everyone's already grousing about the increases in FiOS-TV charges slated for the beginning of next year. Instead of fining them, make them lower their charges in the allegedly affected areas while keeping other locales at the same levels. That's a brilliant idea! Now get back in your box.  Every corporation should have similar penalties imposed rather than paying fines. This is the only way to really punish them. |
|
|
|
patcat88
join:2002-04-05
Jamaica, NY
kudos:1 | said by jmn1207:That's a brilliant idea! Now get back in your box. Every corporation should have similar penalties imposed rather than paying fines. This is the only way to really punish them. But what if a corporation fianances around it and pays the debt off by monthly payments after the punishment period expires by jacking up rates? |
|
| reply to jmn1207
If they did that the tax payers would benefit and not the local governments. They won’t be able to use that fine money to build traffic violation cameras at stop lights so they can mail out tickets. |
|
jmn1207Premium
join:2000-07-19
Ashburn, VA | reply to patcat88
said by patcat88:But what if a corporation fianances around it and pays the debt off by monthly payments after the punishment period expires by jacking up rates? Ok, how about any fines that are levied go DIRECTLY to the customers affected, tax-free. We are already paying for the government to monitor and enforce the rules, so there is absolutely no need to give them any more of our money. |
|
EPS
join:2008-02-13
Hingham, MA | reply to DarkLogix
Hm, that could actually make sense- "If you're going to neglect the copper plant for the shiny new fiber-optic plant, you might as well give us the new shiny fiber-optic plant" |
|
| reply to jmn1207
said by jmn1207:said by Rattler:So they get hit with a crapload of fines. Y'know where that money will eventually come from, don'tcha? Everyone's already grousing about the increases in FiOS-TV charges slated for the beginning of next year. Instead of fining them, make them lower their charges in the allegedly affected areas while keeping other locales at the same levels. That's a brilliant idea! Now get back in your box. Every corporation should have similar penalties imposed rather than paying fines. This is the only way to really punish them. One little problem. What is being suggested is illegal unless the US institutes price controls by act of Congress.
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page
Ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk? |
|
| reply to Rattler
It is cheaper for vz to pay the fines then pay the workers all the ot they want to maintain it. |
|
