republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
4784
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
page: 1 · 2 · 3
AuthorAll Replies


fAcEtIOUs
Premium
join:2002-03-03
kudos:4

Action justified if naked person on album cover is a child

Wikipedia should just delete the album cover from the article if indeed it is a naked child portrayed sexually, which would be against all international laws on child pornography. Delete the pic and the problem goes away.


P Ness
You'Ve Forgotten 9-11 Already
Premium
join:2001-08-29
way way out

sigh talk about an over reaction....



Steimes
I make internets
Premium
join:2002-01-08
Belle Vernon, PA
kudos:1
Reviews:
·Comcast
·Verizon Online DSL

reply to fAcEtIOUs

said by fAcEtIOUs:

Wikipedia should just delete the album cover from the article if indeed it is a naked child portrayed sexually, which would be against all international laws on child pornography. Delete the pic and the problem goes away.
I think this one falls under the "art" protection. Even if the art was used to create controversy.

--
Making procrastination an art form since Pluto was still a planet.


fAcEtIOUs
Premium
join:2002-03-03
kudos:4

said by Steimes:

said by fAcEtIOUs:

Wikipedia should just delete the album cover from the article if indeed it is a naked child portrayed sexually, which would be against all international laws on child pornography. Delete the pic and the problem goes away.
I think this one falls under the "art" protection. Even if the art was used to create controversy.

But that is the excuse used by all child pornography purveyors - that it is art and should be ok.
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page
Ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk?


Karl Bode
News Guy
join:2000-03-02
kudos:30

1 edit

But that is the excuse of all closet fascists, that art which bothers their delicate sensibilities should be banned or thrown in a pile and burned.



N3OGH
Yo Soy Col. "Bat" Guano
Premium
join:2003-11-11
Philly burbs
kudos:1

reply to fAcEtIOUs
On a side note, that girl's got to be in her mid 40's by now.......
--
Petty people are disproportionably corrupted by petty power…



fAcEtIOUs
Premium
join:2002-03-03
kudos:4

1 edit

reply to Karl Bode

said by Karl Bode:

But that is the excuse of all closet fascists, that art which bothers their delicate sensibilities should be banned or thrown in a pile and burned.
So you defend child pornography - as long as it hides under the cover of being art?


Karl Bode
News Guy
join:2000-03-02
kudos:30

Yeah TK. AND the murder of puppies.



45612019

join:2004-02-05
New York, NY

reply to fAcEtIOUs

Re: Action justified if naked person on album cover is a child

said by fAcEtIOUs:

said by Karl Bode:

But that is the excuse of all closet fascists, that art which bothers their delicate sensibilities should be banned or thrown in a pile and burned.
So you defend child pornography?
Yeah. Child pornography is awesome.

Socialism is great too. Free socialist CP for all!

AVonGauss
Premium
join:2007-11-01
Boynton Beach, FL

reply to fAcEtIOUs
If? Did you even look at the links referenced in the article before posting?



tubbynet
reminds me of the danse russe
Premium,MVM
join:2008-01-16
Chandler, AZ

reply to Karl Bode

said by fAcEtIOUs:

So you defend child pornography - as long as it hides under the cover of being art?
said by Karl Bode:

Yeah TK. AND the murder of puppies.
well, in that warped neo-con logic, you are either with him (and the *good* side), or with the terrorists (or whichever group is *not* the good side).

q.


KrK
Heavy Artillery For The Little Guy
Premium
join:2000-01-17
Tulsa, OK
Reviews:
·AT&T DSL Service

reply to fAcEtIOUs

said by fAcEtIOUs:

]But that is the excuse used by all child pornography purveyors - that it is art and should be ok.
No. Porn is porn. If you look at the cover, yes, it's controversial, and yes, some will find it offensive, but it's definitely art, and not porn.
--
"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power." -- Benito Mussolini


Rawr

@yok.utu.fi

reply to N3OGH
Yup. Apparently she was asked about this image about fifteen years ago, and was cool with it.



Rawr

@yok.utu.fi

reply to fAcEtIOUs
There was a huge flame war about this image a few months back. The upshot was that:

1) Wikipedia must comply with local laws to remove illegal content.
2) Wikipedia must not remove content for being legal but in bad taste, or every special interest group on the planet will have a field day.
3) Wikipedia, not being a law firm or a state, has no real way of telling whether something's illegal beyond the blatantly obvious cases.
4) This cover has been around for the last thirty years without being prosecuted, making it a not blatantly obvious case.

If you have any ideas on where to go from here, I'm all ears.



djrobx

join:2000-05-31
Valencia, CA
kudos:1
Reviews:
·Verizon Wireless..
·RoadRunner Cable
·AT&T U-Verse
·VOIPo
·PHONE POWER

reply to N3OGH

said by N3OGH:

On a side note, that girl's got to be in her mid 40's by now.......
If you read the wikipedia article, the woman who was the girl in the photo is fine with it.
--
AT&T U-Hearse
Your funeral. Delivered.


fAcEtIOUs
Premium
join:2002-03-03
kudos:4

said by djrobx:

said by N3OGH:

On a side note, that girl's got to be in her mid 40's by now.......
If you read the wikipedia article, the woman who was the girl in the photo is fine with it.
Legally, that is completely irrelevant.
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page
Ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk?


Nightshade
Premium
join:2002-05-26
Salem, OR

reply to fAcEtIOUs
But the question is the naked child being portrayed sexually?

When I look at the pic I see nothing sexual about it. There is no exposed genitalia. There is no suggestive motions or facial expressions being performed by the child at the time of the shooting of the picture.

Now with that said, I do think the original album cover was done in poor taste. But you can blame the record company for that one. It was their idea, not the band. The record company even said they will go to jail over it. According to the band, the album cover had nothing to do with the song.
--
The true patriot is motivated by a sense of responsibility, and out of self interest -- for himself, his family, and the future of his country -- to resist government abuse of power. He rejects the notion that patriotism means obedience to the state.



Piggie
I Actually use Windstream
Premium
join:2005-11-23
Orange Springs, FL

Hey, lets ban AllMusic.com while we are at it.

»allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sq···xqq5ld6e

Guess Clapton, Windwood and Baker are just too old school to matter.

That is the reason we have a judicial system as least in the US to keep extremists from seeing everything as porn.

Yes it is Art. No it's not sexual.

Like I always said, if you like strict rules, there are still countries where you can immigrate to that will be glad to ban your problems.
--
| Speedstream 4200 Modem - 3m/384 plan | W98-W2KSP4-XPSP2 - All AMD | Buffalo WHR G54S with Tomato 1.18 | 3 downstream switches feeding 6 total clients (no wireless) | Including the Data port on the side of my neck |



N3OGH
Yo Soy Col. "Bat" Guano
Premium
join:2003-11-11
Philly burbs
kudos:1

reply to fAcEtIOUs
I wasn't speaking of the legality of it. You for all the people here should know damn well if anyone knows the legality of such issues, it would be me.

I was simply pointing out an interesting fact that others may not have touched on....
--
Petty people are disproportionably corrupted by petty power…


Thursday, 31-May 07:10:49 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics