Karl Bode
News Guy
join:2000-03-02 | reply to fatness
Re: Action justified if naked person on album cover is a child
Yes, weird how that works. You're a purveyor of child porn for disagreeing with me -- but I'm very, very upset when people engage in personal attacks. |
|
fatness
subtle
Janitor
join:2000-11-17
fishing
 ·EarthLink
Host:
Earthlink DSL
TekSavvy
Forum Feature Requ..
Need Site Help?
Rants, Raves, and ..
| reply to TKJunkMail
said by TKJunkMail  :It wouldn't be necessary if the default 1st choice of response of many posters wasn't personal attacks. said by TKJunkMail :So you defend child pornography - as long as it hides under the cover of being art?
--
goodbye dad |
|
Necronomikro
join:2005-09-01
| reply to TKJunkMail
said by TKJunkMail :said by n0ym :said by TKJunkMail :It wouldn't be necessary if the default 1st choice of response of many posters wasn't personal attacks. Personal attacks are just that. They're not the same thing as ad hominem arguments. Ad hominem remarks are attacks that are made in lieu of legitimate arguments. They're a form of distraction from the real issue. In this case, you're being taken apart both by legitimate, logical responses and being made fun of. » en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_a···_abusiveAd hominem abusive
Ad hominem abusive (also called argumentum ad personam) usually and most notoriously involves insulting or belittling one's opponent, but can also involve pointing out factual but ostensibly damning character flaws or actions which are irrelevant to the opponent's argument. This tactic is logically fallacious because insults and even true negative facts about the opponent's personal character have nothing to do with the logical merits of the opponent's arguments or assertions. Ad hominem as a logical fallacy is when an attack is made in lieu of an argument. However, using an ad-hominem attack after, or in the midst of an argument does not automatically nullify the content within the argument, and does not constitute a logical fallacy, though it may be bad form in a debate. |
|
russotto
join:2000-10-05
Collegeville, PA
| reply to TKJunkMail
said by TKJunkMail :But that is the excuse used by all child pornography purveyors - that it is art and should be ok. »en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poisoning_the_well |
|
TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
 ·Sprint Mobile Broa..
 ·Comcast
| reply to n0ym
said by n0ym :said by TKJunkMail :It wouldn't be necessary if the default 1st choice of response of many posters wasn't personal attacks. Personal attacks are just that. They're not the same thing as ad hominem arguments. Ad hominem remarks are attacks that are made in lieu of legitimate arguments. They're a form of distraction from the real issue. In this case, you're being taken apart both by legitimate, logical responses and being made fun of. »en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_a···_abusive
Ad hominem abusive
Ad hominem abusive (also called argumentum ad personam) usually and most notoriously involves insulting or belittling one's opponent, but can also involve pointing out factual but ostensibly damning character flaws or actions which are irrelevant to the opponent's argument. This tactic is logically fallacious because insults and even true negative facts about the opponent's personal character have nothing to do with the logical merits of the opponent's arguments or assertions.
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page
Ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk? |
|
n0ym
join:2004-12-21
Rockville, MD
| reply to TKJunkMail
said by TKJunkMail :It wouldn't be necessary if the default 1st choice of response of many posters wasn't personal attacks. Personal attacks are just that. They're not the same thing as ad hominem arguments.
Ad hominem remarks are attacks that are made in lieu of legitimate arguments. They're a form of distraction from the real issue.
In this case, you're being taken apart both by legitimate, logical responses and being made fun of. |
|
n0ym
join:2004-12-21
Rockville, MD
| reply to TKJunkMail
You really don't get the "ad hominem" thing, do you?
Kinda makes it easy to understand why your ideas about art and pornography are so simplistic, though. |
|
james
join:2001-02-26
antarctica
| reply to TKJunkMail
said by TKJunkMail :So you defend child pornography - as long as it hides under the cover of being art? Tell me TK, do you support child pornography? No? Then why do you support the blocking of child porn websites rather than having them shut down/used to catch pedophiles?
Logically you must be a pedophile because you're protecting them by hiding them from the public but not shutting them down.
Oh no! Ad-hominem attack'd! Hey, don't get mad at me, you started it!  |
|
james
join:2001-02-26
antarctica
| reply to TKJunkMail
said by TKJunkMail :So you defend child pornography - as long as it hides under the cover of being art? Nudity is not always pornography, and not all pornography involves nudity.
By your reasoning, any pictures of you as a child where you happen to be nude should be destroyed, as they are "child pornography" even if there is nothing sexual going on in the picture.
Face it, you conservatives are the ones with "sick" minds. You assign all this sexuality to things that have none. |
|
tubbynet
reminds me of the danse russe
Premium
join:2008-01-16
Chandler, AZ
·Cox HSI
 ·Callcentric
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·FrontierNet Intern..
2 edits | reply to TKJunkMail
said by TKJunkMail :So you defend child pornography - as long as it hides under the cover of being art? it wouldn't have been necessary if you hadn't used a logical fallacy to characterize karl and what he was trying to say.
»en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man
yes, believe it or not, i passed freshman english too 
q.
edited to add quote clarification
--
those who forget the past are doomed to repeat it... |
|
TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast
| reply to Necronomikro
said by Necronomikro :Wow, someone just discovered logical fallacies, and is shoe-horning everything into one. Congrats. It wouldn't be necessary if the default 1st choice of response of many posters wasn't personal attacks.
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page
Ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk? |
|
AnonMe
@verizon.net | reply to TKJunkMail
I dont find it pornographic either. What did he say that was a personal attack? |
|
Necronomikro
join:2005-09-01
| reply to TKJunkMail
Wow, someone just discovered logical fallacies, and is shoe-horning everything into one. Congrats. |
|
33591094
join:2002-11-19
Canada
1 edit | reply to TKJunkMail
said by TKJunkMail :Wikipedia should just delete the album cover from the article if indeed it is a naked child portrayed sexually, which would be against all international laws on child pornography. Delete the pic and the problem goes away. For someone who hasn't seen the image in question, you sure run your mouth.
Naked - yes.
Sexual? Maybe in your mind. 
--
All trolls are equal, but A troll is more equal than others. |
|
TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast
| reply to russotto
said by russotto :[ How come it does to yours, I wonder??? »en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem_attack |
|
russotto
join:2000-10-05
Collegeville, PA
| reply to TKJunkMail
said by TKJunkMail :But that is the excuse used by all child pornography purveyors - that it is art and should be ok. I don't find the image at all pornographic -- that is, it does not appeal at all to my prurient interest. How come it does to yours, I wonder??? |
|
markwp2001
Spreadhead
Premium
join:2002-05-25
Long Beach, MS
| reply to TKJunkMail
No, just making sure you know what others think of you when you make such ridiculous accusations 
--
Palin is sofa king retarded. |
|
TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast
| reply to markwp2001
said by markwp2001 : scumbag. »en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem_attack
You are in a loop. Press reset. |
|
markwp2001
Spreadhead
Premium
join:2002-05-25
Long Beach, MS | reply to TKJunkMail
You're the person who accused someone of defending child pornography, when they clearly weren't, scumbag.
--
Palin is sofa king retarded. |
|
TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast
| reply to markwp2001
said by markwp2001 :Stupid question, even by your standards said by tubbynet :well, in that warped neo-con logic »en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem_attack 
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page
Ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk? |
|
