 ThrowDemsOutIf you can't convince 'em, confuse 'emPremium
join:2002-03-03
Mullica Hill, NJ
kudos:4 | reply to Steimes
Re: Action justified if naked person on album cover is a child said by Steimes:said by ThrowDemsOut:Wikipedia should just delete the album cover from the article if indeed it is a naked child portrayed sexually, which would be against all international laws on child pornography. Delete the pic and the problem goes away. I think this one falls under the "art" protection. Even if the art was used to create controversy. But that is the excuse used by all child pornography purveyors - that it is art and should be ok.
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page
Ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk? |
|
|
|
1 edit | But that is the excuse of all closet fascists, that art which bothers their delicate sensibilities should be banned or thrown in a pile and burned. |
|
ThrowDemsOutIf you can't convince 'em, confuse 'emPremium
join:2002-03-03
Mullica Hill, NJ
kudos:4
1 edit | said by Karl Bode:But that is the excuse of all closet fascists, that art which bothers their delicate sensibilities should be banned or thrown in a pile and burned. So you defend child pornography - as long as it hides under the cover of being art? |
|
| Yeah TK. AND the murder of puppies. |
|
 Xizer
join:2004-02-05
New York, NY
 ·Cox HSI
 ·AT&T U-Verse
| reply to ThrowDemsOut
said by ThrowDemsOut:said by Karl Bode:But that is the excuse of all closet fascists, that art which bothers their delicate sensibilities should be banned or thrown in a pile and burned. So you defend child pornography? Yeah. Child pornography is awesome.
Socialism is great too. Free socialist CP for all! |
|
 tubbynetreminds me of the danse russePremium,MVM
join:2008-01-16
Chandler, AZ | reply to Karl Bode
said by ThrowDemsOut:So you defend child pornography - as long as it hides under the cover of being art? said by Karl Bode:Yeah TK. AND the murder of puppies. well, in that warped neo-con logic, you are either with him (and the *good* side), or with the terrorists (or whichever group is *not* the good side).
q. |
|
 KrKHeavy Artillery For The Little GuyPremium
join:2000-01-17
Tulsa, OK
 ·AT&T DSL Service
| reply to ThrowDemsOut
said by ThrowDemsOut:]But that is the excuse used by all child pornography purveyors - that it is art and should be ok. No. Porn is porn. If you look at the cover, yes, it's controversial, and yes, some will find it offensive, but it's definitely art, and not porn.
--
"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power." -- Benito Mussolini
|
|
 markwp2001SpreadheadPremium
join:2002-05-25
Long Beach, MS | reply to ThrowDemsOut
said by ThrowDemsOut:said by Karl Bode:But that is the excuse of all closet fascists, that art which bothers their delicate sensibilities should be banned or thrown in a pile and burned. So you defend child pornography - as long as it hides under the cover of being art? Stupid question, even by your standards 
--
Palin is sofa king retarded. |
|
| reply to Xizer
did you say CP?
 |
|
ThrowDemsOutIf you can't convince 'em, confuse 'emPremium
join:2002-03-03
Mullica Hill, NJ
kudos:4 | reply to markwp2001
said by markwp2001:Stupid question, even by your standards said by tubbynet:well, in that warped neo-con logic »en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem_attack 
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page
Ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk? |
|
markwp2001SpreadheadPremium
join:2002-05-25
Long Beach, MS | You're the person who accused someone of defending child pornography, when they clearly weren't, scumbag.
--
Palin is sofa king retarded. |
|
ThrowDemsOutIf you can't convince 'em, confuse 'emPremium
join:2002-03-03
Mullica Hill, NJ
kudos:4 | »en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem_attack
You are in a loop. Press reset. |
|
markwp2001SpreadheadPremium
join:2002-05-25
Long Beach, MS | No, just making sure you know what others think of you when you make such ridiculous accusations
--
Palin is sofa king retarded. |
|
| reply to ThrowDemsOut
said by ThrowDemsOut:But that is the excuse used by all child pornography purveyors - that it is art and should be ok. I don't find the image at all pornographic -- that is, it does not appeal at all to my prurient interest. How come it does to yours, I wonder??? |
|
ThrowDemsOutIf you can't convince 'em, confuse 'emPremium
join:2002-03-03
Mullica Hill, NJ
kudos:4 | said by russotto:[ How come it does to yours, I wonder??? »en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem_attack |
|
1 edit | reply to ThrowDemsOut
said by ThrowDemsOut:Wikipedia should just delete the album cover from the article if indeed it is a naked child portrayed sexually, which would be against all international laws on child pornography. Delete the pic and the problem goes away. For someone who hasn't seen the image in question, you sure run your mouth.
Naked - yes.
Sexual? Maybe in your mind. 
--
All trolls are equal, but A troll is more equal than others. |
|
| reply to ThrowDemsOut
Wow, someone just discovered logical fallacies, and is shoe-horning everything into one. Congrats. |
|
| reply to ThrowDemsOut
I dont find it pornographic either. What did he say that was a personal attack? |
|
ThrowDemsOutIf you can't convince 'em, confuse 'emPremium
join:2002-03-03
Mullica Hill, NJ
kudos:4 | reply to Necronomikro
said by Necronomikro:Wow, someone just discovered logical fallacies, and is shoe-horning everything into one. Congrats. It wouldn't be necessary if the default 1st choice of response of many posters wasn't personal attacks.
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page
Ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk? |
|
tubbynetreminds me of the danse russePremium,MVM
join:2008-01-16
Chandler, AZ
2 edits | said by ThrowDemsOut:So you defend child pornography - as long as it hides under the cover of being art? it wouldn't have been necessary if you hadn't used a logical fallacy to characterize karl and what he was trying to say.
»en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man
yes, believe it or not, i passed freshman english too 
q.
edited to add quote clarification
--
those who forget the past are doomed to repeat it... |
|
