 n0ym
join:2004-12-21 Rockville, MD
| reply to TKJunkMail Re: Action justified if naked person on album cover is a child
You really don't get the "ad hominem" thing, do you?
Kinda makes it easy to understand why your ideas about art and pornography are so simplistic, though. |
|
  james
join:2001-02-26 antarctica
| reply to TKJunkMail said by TKJunkMail :So you defend child pornography - as long as it hides under the cover of being art? Tell me TK, do you support child pornography? No? Then why do you support the blocking of child porn websites rather than having them shut down/used to catch pedophiles?
Logically you must be a pedophile because you're protecting them by hiding them from the public but not shutting them down.
Oh no! Ad-hominem attack'd! Hey, don't get mad at me, you started it!  |
|
  james
join:2001-02-26 antarctica
| reply to TKJunkMail said by TKJunkMail :So you defend child pornography - as long as it hides under the cover of being art? Nudity is not always pornography, and not all pornography involves nudity.
By your reasoning, any pictures of you as a child where you happen to be nude should be destroyed, as they are "child pornography" even if there is nothing sexual going on in the picture.
Face it, you conservatives are the ones with "sick" minds. You assign all this sexuality to things that have none. |
|
  33591094
join:2002-11-19 Canada
1 edit | reply to TKJunkMail said by TKJunkMail :Wikipedia should just delete the album cover from the article if indeed it is a naked child portrayed sexually, which would be against all international laws on child pornography. Delete the pic and the problem goes away. For someone who hasn't seen the image in question, you sure run your mouth.
Naked - yes. Sexual? Maybe in your mind.  -- All trolls are equal, but A troll is more equal than others. |
|
  markwp2001 Spreadhead Premium join:2002-05-25 Long Beach, MS
| reply to TKJunkMail No, just making sure you know what others think of you when you make such ridiculous accusations  -- Palin is sofa king retarded. |
|
  TKJunkMail Enjoy the sun Premium join:2002-03-03 Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast
| reply to markwp2001 said by markwp2001 : scumbag. »en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem_attack
You are in a loop. Press reset. |
|
  markwp2001 Spreadhead Premium join:2002-05-25 Long Beach, MS | reply to TKJunkMail You're the person who accused someone of defending child pornography, when they clearly weren't, scumbag. -- Palin is sofa king retarded. |
|
  TKJunkMail Enjoy the sun Premium join:2002-03-03 Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast
| reply to markwp2001 said by markwp2001 :Stupid question, even by your standards said by tubbynet :well, in that warped neo-con logic »en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem_attack 
-- My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page Ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk? |
|
  bender Bite my shiny metal ass Premium join:2005-03-19 Evanston, IL clubs: | reply to Xizer did you say CP?
|
|
  markwp2001 Spreadhead Premium join:2002-05-25 Long Beach, MS
| reply to TKJunkMail said by TKJunkMail :said by Karl Bode :But that is the excuse of all closet fascists, that art which bothers their delicate sensibilities should be banned or thrown in a pile and burned. So you defend child pornography - as long as it hides under the cover of being art? Stupid question, even by your standards  -- Palin is sofa king retarded. |
|
  tubbynet reminds me of the danse russe Premium join:2008-01-16 Chandler, AZ
·Cox HSI
·Callcentric
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·FrontierNet Intern..
| reply to Karl Bode said by TKJunkMail :So you defend child pornography - as long as it hides under the cover of being art? said by Karl Bode :Yeah TK. AND the murder of puppies. well, in that warped neo-con logic, you are either with him (and the *good* side), or with the terrorists (or whichever group is *not* the good side).
q. |
|
  Xizer
join:2004-02-05 New York, NY
| reply to TKJunkMail said by TKJunkMail :said by Karl Bode :But that is the excuse of all closet fascists, that art which bothers their delicate sensibilities should be banned or thrown in a pile and burned. So you defend child pornography? Yeah. Child pornography is awesome.
Socialism is great too. Free socialist CP for all! |
|
  Karl Bode News Guy join:2000-03-02 | reply to TKJunkMail Yeah TK. AND the murder of puppies. |
|
  TKJunkMail Enjoy the sun Premium join:2002-03-03 Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast
1 edit | reply to Karl Bode said by Karl Bode :But that is the excuse of all closet fascists, that art which bothers their delicate sensibilities should be banned or thrown in a pile and burned. So you defend child pornography - as long as it hides under the cover of being art? |
|
  Karl Bode News Guy join:2000-03-02 1 edit | reply to TKJunkMail But that is the excuse of all closet fascists, that art which bothers their delicate sensibilities should be banned or thrown in a pile and burned. |
|