 markwp2001SpreadheadPremium
join:2002-05-25
Long Beach, MS | reply to fAcEtIOUs
Re: Action justified if naked person on album cover is a child said by fAcEtIOUs:said by Karl Bode:But that is the excuse of all closet fascists, that art which bothers their delicate sensibilities should be banned or thrown in a pile and burned. So you defend child pornography - as long as it hides under the cover of being art? Stupid question, even by your standards 
--
Palin is sofa king retarded. |
|
| said by markwp2001:Stupid question, even by your standards said by tubbynet:well, in that warped neo-con logic »en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem_attack 
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page
Ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk? |
|
markwp2001SpreadheadPremium
join:2002-05-25
Long Beach, MS | You're the person who accused someone of defending child pornography, when they clearly weren't, scumbag.
--
Palin is sofa king retarded. |
|
| »en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem_attack
You are in a loop. Press reset. |
|
|
|
markwp2001SpreadheadPremium
join:2002-05-25
Long Beach, MS | No, just making sure you know what others think of you when you make such ridiculous accusations
--
Palin is sofa king retarded. |
|
n0ym
join:2004-12-21
Rockville, MD | reply to fAcEtIOUs
You really don't get the "ad hominem" thing, do you?
Kinda makes it easy to understand why your ideas about art and pornography are so simplistic, though. |
|
