 james
join:2001-02-26
CWCville USA | reply to fAcEtIOUs
Re: Action justified if naked person on album cover is a child said by fAcEtIOUs:So you defend child pornography - as long as it hides under the cover of being art? Nudity is not always pornography, and not all pornography involves nudity.
By your reasoning, any pictures of you as a child where you happen to be nude should be destroyed, as they are "child pornography" even if there is nothing sexual going on in the picture.
Face it, you conservatives are the ones with "sick" minds. You assign all this sexuality to things that have none. |
