<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Moffett  is an idiot in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r21552166</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 22:35:56 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 22:35:56 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Moffett  is an idiot</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21553716</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1039313"><b>tshirt</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  JSRoman <A HREF="/useremail/u/1171845"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br>......It is imperative cable get into wireless to keep some of those subs that will go without a landline in the future. </div> It maybe a good move at some point, the question is , is now the right momment.<br> It will only work when the can get inter-carrier coverage i.e. for best effect the cable industry must work as one body. The second factor is waiting until all have wide spread/univeral D3 rollout. and the third is waiting for LTE to ... evolve.<br> given the current economy, and the bigger push towards spending on D3 (absolutely nessesary to protect their market share) and the history of limited intersystem cooperation. probably holding off on the wireless/frontal attack on the Telco's for a couple years is a wise move.<br>Doesn't mean they shouldn't begin thinking/talking to each other about it.<br><br>There's my analysis, for free ;)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21553716</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 15:09:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Moffett  is an idiot</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21552216</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1318502"><b>ARGONAUT</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  JSRoman <A HREF="/useremail/u/1171845"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Wireless has been the one growth area for VZ and AT&T and has somewhat helped with drastic drop in landlines. What does he think is going to happen to all those cable voip subs once people get use to not having a home phone and go wireless? It is imperative cable get into wireless to keep some of those subs that will go without a landline in the future. <br><br>I can't believe people pay that guy. <br> </div><b>I second that!</b><br><small>--<br><i>PentiumD 930 DC 3.0GHz - 4GB PC2-4200 - 300GB SATA - BFG Nvidia  7950GT OC 512MB<br> - Hauppauge WinTV-HVR-1600(1101MCE) - Vista Ultimate SP1 32bit</i></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21552216</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 10:38:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Moffett  is an idiot</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21552166</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1171845"><b>JSRoman</b></A> : Wireless has been the one growth area for VZ and AT&T and has somewhat helped with drastic drop in landlines. What does he think is going to happen to all those cable voip subs once people get use to not having a home phone and go wireless? It is imperative cable get into wireless to keep some of those subs that will go without a landline in the future. <br><br>I can't believe people pay that guy. <br><small>--<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.seabee.navy.mil" >www.seabee.navy.mil</A></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21552166</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 10:26:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
