site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
1202
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


fatness
subtle
Janitor
join:2000-11-17
fishing
kudos:13
Host:
Bright House Netwo..
Earthlink DSL
TekSavvy
Forum Feature Requ..
Need Site Help

child pornography




spamd
Premium
join:2001-04-22
Cherry Valley, IL

Careful that photo right there just might make Cuomo a NY state senator.
--
When everything is coming your way, you are in the wrong lane.


qworster

join:2001-11-25
Bryn Mawr, PA
Reviews:
·MSN
·Brand X Internet
·DSL EXTREME

reply to fatness

Don't laugh-this isn't funny!

Considering that Australia has already decided that drawings are also kiddie porn, this might truly BE considered child porn in Australia!

When I see these piss poor decisions, I begin to wonder WHO HAS the dirty minds to FIND drawings such as this to be pornography!

seederjed

join:2005-02-28
Snellville, GA

reply to spamd

Re: child pornography

Once again nobody mentions the cover of Nirvana's "Nevermind" album.


james

join:2001-02-26
CWCville USA

1 edit

reply to qworster

Re: Don't laugh-this isn't funny!

said by qworster:

Considering that Australia has already decided that drawings are also kiddie porn...
Actually, the judge decided that fictional characters are in fact "persons". I'd love to see their voters lists... maybe Mickey Mouse and Roger Rabbit will cast a vote.

Justice Adams ruled the word "person" included imaginary or fictional characters and that an unrealistic representation of a figure did not preclude that figure from being a "person".


jtudor
Xm 60's On 6 Freak
Premium,MVM
join:2002-12-07
Morganton, NC

Didn't Donald Duck already get banned somewhere because he never wears pants?



james

join:2001-02-26
CWCville USA

I think Mickey Mouse was convicted of something in some middle eastern country, I remember someone condemning him to beheading.



james

join:2001-02-26
CWCville USA

reply to seederjed

Re: child pornography

said by seederjed:

Once again nobody mentions the cover of Nirvana's "Nevermind" album.
It's not a sexual pose at all though, it doesn't even need to be justified as art. It's the sort of photograph that you would find in any family's house, just open up a photo album of their kids as babies.


Jason Levine
Premium
join:2001-07-13
USA

I seem to recall a recent case where a grandmother was arrested on child pornography charges because a photo printing clerk saw photos of nude kids (her grandchildren) in the photos she was getting printed. I've taken more than my share of bath time photos of my kids, would this mean I have child porn on my computer?

After some Googling, I found an article about it complete with one of the photos in question: »www.popphoto.com/popularphotogra···ife.html
--
-Jason Levine
Support a children's charity. Buy a calendar and/or a photo book. Shooting For A Cause



james

join:2001-02-26
CWCville USA

That link does contain a couple cases where I think the person in question was stupid to take the pictures, but for the most part that is a quite terrifying article.


Thursday, 31-May 07:22:16 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics