republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » US Cable Support » Road Runner » [TWC] Outstanding speed with Time Warner
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
5603
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
Post a:
Post a:
TWC - Dallas email sending multiple copies »
« cable download fluctuation  
page: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6
AuthorAll Replies


nycnetwork

join:2000-11-12
Brooklyn, NY
reply to BillyZoom
Re: [TWC] Outstanding speed with Time Warner

As I said before, just ignore all of the anonymous users that just keep coming back. There is a valid reason why they never registered.
Settings->Ignore all Anon.


BillyZoom

join:2008-05-15
Daytona Beach, FL
Ummmm Why? I thought it was a valid question.


VenturaResident1

@rr.com

reply to mandziakws
Click for full size
Camarillo CA 15/2 with PowerBoost


Hieu

@wdc.com
reply to mandziakws
Can anybody get speed test higher than 6Mx512K on RR standard?


RigginsTom

@rr.com

Method3909

join:2008-08-30
New York
Road Runner Turbo (15/1) w/ PowerBoost in Albany, NY:



Anonymous_
Anonymous
Premium
join:2004-06-21
127.0.0.1
clubs:
·RoadRunner Cable
·Time Warner Cable
·Time Warner VOIP


2 edits
reply to Jameson
said by Jameson See Profile :

said by Anonymous_ See Profile :

Fiber Slow speeds



even dialup is fiber opitc fast because at some point it runs over FIBER!
Are you saying that I can get these speeds with my dialup?
you can get high speed over analog

broadband over power lines
500 kilobits and 3 megabits per second

right now i am running a analog network that gets 32 to 40mbps
much faster then 11g


mandziakws

@rr.com
My speeds are slowing down!



BillyZoom

join:2008-05-15
Daytona Beach, FL

1 edit
reply to Anonymous_
Hey punker, are you sure you live in California and not in Maine?


Anonymous_
Anonymous
Premium
join:2004-06-21
127.0.0.1
clubs:
reply to BillyZoom
meh my used to be 78ms to the east cost many years ago


Turbo RR

@rr.com

said by Anonymous_ See Profile :

meh my used to be 78ms to the east cost many years ago
Hey punker,

This is my ping from cal to ME. Whats yours?

Just curious as we both are in Cal with TWC.



Anonymous_
Anonymous
Premium
join:2004-06-21
127.0.0.1
clubs:


Turbo RR

@rr.com

Thanks punker.

Here is a tracert to that server thought you may want to know.

Pinging 216.220.230.37 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 216.220.230.37: bytes=32 time=89ms TTL=46
Reply from 216.220.230.37: bytes=32 time=89ms TTL=46
Reply from 216.220.230.37: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=46
Reply from 216.220.230.37: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=46

Ping statistics for 216.220.230.37:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 87ms, Maximum = 89ms, Average = 88ms

Tracing route to 216.220.230.37 over a maximum of 30 hops

1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 192.168.224.40
2 16 ms 7 ms 7 ms 10.42.160.1
3 14 ms 7 ms 7 ms cpe-24-24-193-113.socal.rr.com [24.24.193.113]
4 8 ms 19 ms 16 ms ae6.chswca1-rtr2.socal.rr.com [66.75.145.32]
5 14 ms 11 ms 28 ms ge-4-3-0.tustca1-rtr1.socal.rr.com [66.75.145.13
]
6 12 ms 11 ms 15 ms te-1-3.car1.Tustin1.Level3.net [4.79.140.37]
7 22 ms 22 ms 70 ms ae-2-3.bar1.Tustin1.Level3.net [4.69.132.218]
8 15 ms 16 ms 13 ms ae-0-11.bar2.Tustin1.Level3.net [4.69.136.198]
9 46 ms 53 ms 53 ms ae-10-10.ebr1.Dallas1.Level3.net [4.69.136.206]

10 45 ms 67 ms 54 ms ae-81-81.csw3.Dallas1.Level3.net [4.69.136.130]

11 55 ms 54 ms 52 ms ae-82-82.ebr2.Dallas1.Level3.net [4.69.136.145]

12 99 ms 90 ms 89 ms ae-6.ebr3.NewYork1.Level3.net [4.69.137.122]
13 95 ms 89 ms 92 ms ae-83-83.csw3.NewYork1.Level3.net [4.69.134.106]

14 86 ms 89 ms 86 ms ae-81-81.ebr1.NewYork1.Level3.net [4.69.134.73]

15 91 ms 89 ms 93 ms ae-1-8.bar2.Boston1.Level3.net [4.69.140.97]
16 93 ms 92 ms 91 ms ae-5-5.car2.Boston1.Level3.net [4.69.132.249]
17 95 ms 107 ms 93 ms CWIE-LLC.car2.Boston1.Level3.net [4.53.50.18]
18 90 ms 89 ms 89 ms 66-252-32-178.da.midmaine.com [66.252.32.178]
19 87 ms 88 ms 92 ms 216.220.230.37

Trace complete.

If i ping the server it's 88ms, but speedtest shows 73ms?


RigginsTom

@rr.com


mandziakws

@rr.com
reply to mandziakws
-
Forums » US Cable Support » Road RunnerTWC - Dallas email sending multiple copies »
« cable download fluctuation  
page: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6


Wednesday, 02-Dec 11:46:49 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [159] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [71] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [69] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
· [60] Broadband Killed The Game Console
· [52] Rogers Unveils The ISP Dream Model
· [45] ACTA: Global Three Strikes
· [41] Rural Carriers Quickly Embracing Fiber
· [40] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [35] Charter Exits Chapter 11
· [33] AT&T Top Lobbyist Cicconi Has His Feelings Hurt
Most people now reading
· Am I the only one that loves to work in IT? [No, I Will Not Fix Your #@$!! Computer]
· MS admits Windows Updates principally created to annoy [Security]
· Ooma changing features [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Data Usage Meter Launched [Comcast HSI]
· Options if ACTA is ratified [TekSavvy]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· IMG 1.7 (IMG Updates and Discussion) [Verizon FIOS TV]
· A little freaky, not sure if its legit. [Spam, Scam and Phishbusters]
· Free SIP Providers [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Heating - my dad gave me this advice... [Home Repair & Improvement]