republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Sprint Settles ETF Lawsuit For $17.5 Million » What Is The Problem?
Uniqs:
277
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:

pnh102
Reptiles Are Cuddly And Pretty
Premium
join:2002-05-02
Mount Airy, MD
·Comcast

What Is The Problem?

I still fail to see any problem with any ETF provided that the terms are clearly spelled out and they are being enforced fairly.

If someone agrees to a contract with an ETF, then he/she shouldn't whine when the carrier decides to enforce the ETF. Given that it is trivially easy for someone to get a cell phone with no ETF, there really is no excuse for the states to get involved at all.
--
Reptiles Are Cuddly And Pretty

jhboricua
ExMod 2000-01
join:2000-06-06
Minneapolis, MN
clubs:


2 edits

Re: What Is The Problem?

said by pnh102 See Profile :

I still fail to see any problem with any ETF provided that the terms are clearly spelled out and they are being enforced fairly.
That's the problem, they weren't spelled out clearly nor enforced fairly. Sprint was notorious for extending contracts WITHOUT telling their customers when they made trivial changes to their plans, making the ETF an almost non expiring matter. I know they tried to pull that crap with me, twice. They deserve every single lawsuit coming their way.
--
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." - Albert Einstein
Jose A. Hernandez * System Admin * MPLS, Minnesota, USA *

joako
Premium
join:2000-09-07
/dev/null
·AT&T U-Verse

Re: What Is The Problem?

said by jhboricua See Profile :

said by pnh102 See Profile :

I still fail to see any problem with any ETF provided that the terms are clearly spelled out and they are being enforced fairly.
That's the problem, they weren't spelled out clearly nor enforced fairly. Sprint was notorious for extending contracts WITHOUT telling their customers when they made trivial changes to their plans, making the ETF an almost non expiring matter. I know they tried to pull that crap with me, twice. They deserve every single lawsuit coming their way.
I agree. The same thing happened to me. I have been having massive service issues and they offered to send me a free replacement phone. At the same time they extended my contract by 2 years without telling me. Yes I did get something in return, but they never told me about it. Had I been given the option, I probably would not have accepted if they were up-front about their offer. When I tried to dispute this Sprint did not want to hear any of it. Even worse, they sent me a "return kit" to send back the old phone, what they didn't tell me is that they were sending me a free phone outright and that I had no obligation to return the old phone. So Sprint got a perfectly good phone (the issue was the coverage, not the phone) that they probably sold to someone else as "refurbished."

BTW: That phone they said would fix my issues didn't -- the problem is the coverage and nothing will fix that short of rolling out more towers.

I also have had massive billing issues, as far as Sprint saying I called my bank and disputed the charges. I did no such thing and the charges were never reversed. It took more than a month and it was finally fixed as a "courtesy." I think many of these contracts are very one-sided... you can't sue the company even. If you look at case law, in many cases advertisement for products and services is usually considered an extension of the contract. When you take that into account the providers need to be more lenient to the consumer. The cellco's can promise all these great things and not really deliver and when you call and tell them that your service is not as promised you are told too bad pay $200 if you want to switch "you agreed to the contract" But what about all the promises of "largest network," or "best network," or "fewest dropped calls?" The mobile carriers are barely held to their claims.
--
09:F9:11:02:9D:74:E3:5B:D8:41:56:C5:63:56:88:C0
centsofhumor

join:2007-01-20
Two Rivers, WI

Re: What Is The Problem?

Thank the idiots that pushed for digital

hjgjgjgj

@rogers.com
so I guess then if its spelled in the contract then if I was told also spelled out and said on TV Unlimited then I guess I should be getting unlimited not a Unlimited with a cap???

BBN2083A

@cox.net

It isn't cut and dry black and white - Just because someone agrees to something, doesn't automatically make that something legal and enforceable or fair. It's similar in principle to their pro-rated minutes and SMSs - you sign up on the 15th, you only get 1/2 the minutes, and 1/2 the anything on the plan. Why should the ETF be any different? You can't have the pro ration on one thing, and not on the other, especially when it's to your advantage. Pro rate the ETF as well as everything else charged - it's really not that hard of a concept to grasp when you plant yourself in the shoes of the "victim".
djhexer

join:2002-10-07
Sparks, NV

Heres an off topic question.

ETF's are supposed to be to offset the cost on equipment correct?

Then why is it I AM stuck with t-mobile for the next year and a half w/o getting a new phone. all because they lowered my plan by 10.00/mo

I did NOT agree to a 24 mo extension just to save 10.00/mo but they said I did and if I get a new handset now. the 24 mo starts over again

jhboricua
ExMod 2000-01
join:2000-06-06
Minneapolis, MN
clubs:

Re: What Is The Problem?

said by djhexer See Profile :

Heres an off topic question.

ETF's are supposed to be to offset the cost on equipment correct?

Then why is it I AM stuck with t-mobile for the next year and a half w/o getting a new phone. all because they lowered my plan by 10.00/mo

I did NOT agree to a 24 mo extension just to save 10.00/mo but they said I did and if I get a new handset now. the 24 mo starts over again
What, you didn't see that buried one-liner comment on your bill regarding this???

This is a prime example of what I consider unfair practices by the wireless providers. It's funny that only when the specter of regulation by the Government shows up they suddenly become 'sensitive' to the issues their customers are complaining off.
bigpapae35

join:2002-10-25
Great Neck, NY
you technically shouldnt care about paying the etf of $175, since you are saving about that much in the course of two years.
hottboiinnc
ME

join:2003-10-15
Cleveland, OH
·Time Warner Cable
·buckeye cable

You area free to upgrade your phone with TM. Buy a phone from someone else- CL, eBay or where ever and just put your SIM in it. Hell even get the iPhone and use it as long as you put Jailbreak on it.

TM isn't stopping you they just fail to tell you that you can get a phone without going directly through them. And you should be glad they lowered your plan they didn't have to do that but TM's customer service is one of the best out there.

Also you can call Customer Service get the fax number for Customer Relations Department (yes they will provide that number to you) type them a letter in Word print it and take it to your Local TM Corp. Store and have them fax it. They will call you back. That is the only way to talk to that department though. And the store MUST be owned by TM to get it faxed for free.

BIGMIKE
Premium
join:2002-06-07
Westminster, CA

said by pnh102 See Profile :

I still fail to see any problem with any ETF provided that the terms are clearly spelled out and they are being enforced fairly.

If someone agrees to a contract with an ETF, then he/she shouldn't whine when the carrier decides to enforce the ETF. Given that it is trivially easy for someone to get a cell phone with no ETF, there really is no excuse for the states to get involved at all.
California Unfair Practices Act

Spelled out in black and white on »www.yuricareport.com/CalifRecall···Act.html

joako
Premium
join:2000-09-07
/dev/null
·AT&T U-Verse

Well I called today to cancel a line with Sprint where the contract ends 01/10/2009 and I wasn't given much hassle and as promised by three previous agents -- I was NOT charged an ETF (within 30 days of the "real" contract end date). However, Sprint does not pro-rate charges.
--
09:F9:11:02:9D:74:E3:5B:D8:41:56:C5:63:56:88:C0
Forums » Sprint Settles ETF Lawsuit For $17.5 Million


Wednesday, 02-Dec 20:14:43 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [161] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [93] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [79] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [70] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
· [62] Broadband Killed The Game Console
· [54] Rogers Unveils The ISP Dream Model
· [46] ACTA: Global Three Strikes
· [41] Rural Carriers Quickly Embracing Fiber
· [38] Charter Exits Chapter 11
· [38] AT&T, Verizon Drop 3G Ad Dispute
Most people now reading
· MS admits Windows Updates principally created to annoy [Security]
· IMG 1.7 (IMG Updates and Discussion) [Verizon FIOS TV]
· Captchas get smarter [Security]
· [WIN7] When exactly should you flash bios when installing new OS [Microsoft Help]
· Quality/longevity of 15A 120V receptacles [Home Repair & Improvement]
· [Scam] Cruise line mail? [Spam, Scam and Phishbusters]
· 16% packet loss. damn dsl. los angeles [AT&T West]
· Using AirMax to provide triple play services? [Wireless Service Providers]
· [Newsgroups] Newzleech down? [Filesharing Software]
· A little freaky, not sure if its legit. [Spam, Scam and Phishbusters]