Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Up and Running » Security » Security » Firefox is the Most Vulnerable Application in 2008
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
4296
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
Post a:
Post a:
Adobe Flash Player for Linux SWF Processing Vulnerability »
« Microsoft patches IE, but Firefox is still safer  
page: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4
AuthorAll Replies

matunga

join:2003-07-26


4 edits
Firefox is the Most Vulnerable Application in 2008

Click for full size
Firefox is the most vulnerable application in 2008
The Most Vulnerable Applications in 2008
To help IT departments better understand the vulnerable applications running in their environment and what they can do about them, Bit9 has created a research brief listing the top 12 popular applications with known vulnerabilities for the year 2008.

Five of the top 12 applications with known vulnerabilities include:
- Mozilla Firefox, versions 2.x and 3.x
- Adobe Acrobat, versions 8.1.2 and 8.1.1
- Microsoft Windows Live (MSN) Messenger, versions 4.7 and 5.1
- Apple iTunes, versions 3.2 and 3.1.2
- Skype, version 3.5.0.248

»www.bit9.com/landing/2008vulnerableapps.php
»www.bit9.com/news-events/press-r···p?id=102

SUMware
Premium
join:2002-05-21


4 edits
Re: Daft list names Firefox, Adobe and VMWare as top threats

Note: matunga retitled the thread from the original "Daft list names Firefox, Adobe and VMWare as top threats" since my post.

More from your link:

quote:
Bit9, Inc., the pioneer and leader in Enterprise Application Whitelisting, unveiled its annual ranking of popular consumer applications with known security vulnerabilities. Often running outside of the IT department’s knowledge or control, these applications can be difficult to detect; they create data leakage risk in endpoints that are otherwise secure; and cause compliance breaches that can result in costly fines. The list, published in a research brief entitled “2008’s Popular Applications with Critical Vulnerabilities,” is designed to highlight the need for greater visibility and control over organizations’ endpoints, including laptops, PCs servers and Point-of-Sale systems.

each application on the list has the following characteristics:

Runs on Microsoft Windows.
• Is well-known in the consumer space and frequently downloaded by individuals.
Is not classified as malicious by enterprise IT organizations or security vendors.
• Contains at least one critical vulnerability that was:
o first reported in January 2008 or after,
o registered in the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology’s (NIST) official vulnerability database at »nvd.nist.gov, and given a severity rating of high (between 7.0-10.0) on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).

["The biggies"]

Relies on the end user, rather than a central IT administrator, to manually patch or upgrade the software to eliminate the vulnerability, if such a patch exists.

The application cannot be automatically and centrally updated via free Enterprise tools such as Microsoft SMS & WSUS.

To read the full list of applications, which includes products from Symantec, Yahoo!, Trend Micro, Sun Microsystems and more, download the research report at: »bit9.com/landing/2008vulnerableapps.php. There, IT managers can learn more about the application vulnerabilities, along with the benefits of using application white listing, a proactive approach to endpoint security.
[emphasis added]

It is important to notice the caveats. You'll never see MS IE in this list.

-

Bit9 is not an independent, impartial testing/reporting agency. This is a promotional and marketing tool.

»www.bit9.com/about/index.php
quote:
Bit9 is the pioneer and leader in Enterprise Application Whitelisting. The company's patented solutions ensure only trusted and authorized applications are allowed to run on Windows computers, eliminating the risk caused by malicious, illegal and unauthorized software.

Bit9 is privately held and based in Waltham, Massachusetts.


agnutam

@anonymouse.org


1 edit

from:
tempnexus See Profile

reply to matunga
Re: Firefox is the Most Vulnerable Application in 2008

Also don't forget to mention things like:
»Internet Explorer Data Binding Memory Corruption Vuln

Vulnerability in Internet Explorer Could Allow Remote Code Execution
»Microsoft Security Advisory (961051)

Microsoft Internet Explorer contains an invalid pointer vulnerability in its data binding code, which can allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code on a vulnerable system.
»www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/493881

A stack buffer overflow vulnerability in the Microsoft Windows Server service may allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code with SYSTEM privileges.
»www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/827267

The WordPad Text Converter for Word 97 files included in some versions of Windows contains an unspecified error which can allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code on a vulnerable system.
»www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/926676

.

Frodo

join:2006-05-05
Lees Summit, MO
reply to matunga
The Register also had an article abount this matter.
»www.theregister.co.uk/2008/12/12···at_list/

RayW
Premium
join:2001-09-01
Layton, UT
clubs:
·XMission

reply to matunga
Yup, FF is so vulnerable. I am ready to redo the machine that runs (was fully patched) IE because it has been infected again. My two FF machines are still looking good, only time IE is used on them is to do Microsoft Tuesday updates. Have to have the IE machine because of all the M$ fanboys (like the US government) who write M$ specific pages that only IE can run.

Of course, this time it may have been a Flash site that did it since this is the first time I allowed Flash to be added on that machine, never again!.
--
I am not lost, I find myself every time.


gimmick

@cox.net


from:
highacidity See Profile

reply to matunga
This is a gimmick by bit9 to sell their products/services. Obviously they left off IE and other very vulnerable applications since it doesn't fit their revenue model. Sounds like the "visit our website and we'll give you a free virus scan" gimmick isn't working for them.

SUMware
Premium
join:2002-05-21


1 edit
reply to Frodo
said by Frodo See Profile :

The Register also had an article abount this matter.
»www.theregister.co.uk/2008/12/12···at_list/
Thanks for the link. From The Reg:
said by The Register :
Daft list names Firefox, Adobe and VMWare as top threats[now we know where matunga got the original thread title (dictionary def. - daft: 1. Mad; crazy. 2. Foolish; stupid.)]

Bit9 trolls for publicity

Vulnerable applications that fail to lend themselves to updating through corporate tools are creating a security gap, according to a ludicrous list from whitelisting firm Bit9.

Bit9's list of "threats in plain sight" names Firefox at the top of a "Dirty Dozen", essentially because it's both popular and has been the subject of critical vulnerabilities over the last year. Firefox and many of the other applications listed, including iTunes and Acrobat, do have auto-updating features, though that's not obvious from what Bit9 says.

True, as the little-known Bit9 suggests, many of these applications are infrequently updated, but to go on to suggest that they are akin to more inappropriate applications such as P2P file sharing programs and the like is a bit much. Throwing VMWare and Symantec into the list is just plain silly. And when Bit9 releases its report in PDF format while implying Acrobat is an "under the radar" security threat, you really have to wonder what's going on.

"Often running outside of the IT department’s knowledge or control, these applications can be difficult to detect; they create data leakage risk in endpoints that are otherwise secure; and cause compliance breaches that can result in costly fines," Bit9 said (our emphasis).

We've emailed the firm challenging it to come up with evidence of any organisation fined for using iTunes or Firefox, no word yet.

Bit9 said its research is designed to "highlight the need for greater visibility and control over organizations’ endpoints, including laptops, PCs servers and Point-of-Sale systems". End-point protection, preventing malware infection and keeping patches up to date on clients, is a key topic in information security but to overplay the significance of users installing Yahoo! on their machines contributes little to the debate.

Bit9's research report (pdf, registration required) list the "Dirty Dozen" applications as below (actually a list of software developers, like Apple and Symantec, not applications at all).

01. Mozilla Firefox
02. Adobe Flash & Acrobat
03. EMC VMware Player, Workstation and other products
04. Sun Java Runtime Environment (JRE)
05. Apple QuickTime, Safari & iTunes
06. Symantec
07. Trend Micro
08. Citrix Products
09. Aurigma, Lycos
10. Skype
11. Yahoo! Assistant
12. Microsoft Windows Live (MSN) Messenger

The list only covers Windows apps popular with consumers (so how does Citrix get in the list?), that had a critical vulnerability over the last year, and rely on end users to update, as explained in Bit9's flame-baiting press release here.
matunga - fail.


neochu

@mnsi.net


from:
highacidity See Profile

reply to matunga
Re: Firefox is the Most Vulnerable Application in 2008

said by matunga See Profile
...My two FF machines are still looking good, only time IE is used on them is to do Microsoft Tuesday updates. Have to have the IE machine because of all the M$ fanboys (like the US government) who write M$ specific pages that only IE can run....
[/BQUOTE :


I have had no trouble running MU with IEtab or IEView as well as most sites that use IE specific tags. I don't know if the virtualization exposes the same security nor what your opinion is on these extensions however (like a memory leak) but Its something I like to point out whenever I hear about this.

Shame likewise politics like this have to happen though as I know several A++ certs who believe the same thing that firefox is less secure than IE. The fact you even need a extension like this is sad as well


SnowyOne
Premium
join:2003-04-05
Kailua, HI
·RoadRunner Cable
·Clearwire Wireless

reply to SUMware
OT but...

said by SUMware See Profile :

Note: matunga retitled the thread from the original "Daft list names Firefox, Adobe and VMWare as top threats"...
I've never had an opinion on the merits of matunga See Profile's posts but this type of manipulation helps me understand some of the harsher criticism I've seen directed at him.

Personally I'd rather be guilty of posting something that flew in face of an agenda rather than manipulating facts to support an agenda.


Doctor Four
My other vehicle is a TARDIS
Premium
join:2000-09-05
Dallas, TX
reply to matunga
Re: Firefox is the Most Vulnerable Application in 2008

To quote a line from the Hitchhiker's Guide To The Galaxy:

"I'm sorry, I just don't believe a word of it."


dadkins
Can you do Blu?
Premium,MVM
join:2003-09-26
Hercules, CA
·Comcast

reply to matunga
No worries!
I use Opera!

Yes, I'm THAT bored...
--
Think outside the Fox... Opera

PrntRhd

join:2004-11-03
Fairfield, CA

1 edit
reply to matunga
Sorry, this is just more crap.
Matunga is the perfect shill. Just posts some FUD then never replies or discusses his own posts, that way he never is trapped into admitting he is wrong or biased.
He is both wrong and biased.


Steve
I'm a PC, so shut up
Consultant
join:2001-03-10
Yorba Linda, CA

said by PrntRhd See Profile :

He is both wrong and biased.
Everybody has a bias - what's wrong with that?

PrntRhd

join:2004-11-03
Fairfield, CA
·Comcast
·Comcast Formerly ..


1 edit
said by Steve See Profile :

said by PrntRhd See Profile :

He is both wrong and biased.
Everybody has a bias - what's wrong with that?
Nothing, I at least admit my bias if cornered.

Matunga has posted 469 times in 487 visits. He only posts, not here to discuss anything. The record speaks for itself.


Cudni
La Merma - Vigilado
Premium,MVM
join:2003-12-20
Someshire

reply to Steve
said by Steve See Profile :

Everybody has a bias - what's wrong with that?
it has to be a shared bias?

Cudni


Blackbird
Built for Speed
Premium
join:2005-01-14
Fort Wayne, IN
·Verizon Online DSL

reply to matunga
Personally, I'm rather biased against sharing my biases.

At least M shares. Freely. Even profusely...
--
If God wanted us to work with electrons, He'd make them big enough to see...
-
Forums » Up and Running » Security » SecurityAdobe Flash Player for Linux SWF Processing Vulnerability »
« Microsoft patches IE, but Firefox is still safer  
page: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4


Sunday, 08-Nov 12:29:17 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [156] Cable Uncapper Faces Criminal Charges
· [140] AT&T Sues Verizon Over 3G Ads
· [112] Why Run Fiber When You Can Run Ads That Pretend You Do?
· [108] Comcast Is Simply Getting Huge
· [92] Apple Cooking Up New $30 A Month TV Service?
· [82] Bits Of ACTA Agreement Leaking Out
· [80] Will 'Three Strikes' Come To The United States?
· [78] Verizon To Double Smartphone ETFs?
· [76] Verizon: Droid Tethering Will Cost $30 Extra
· [73] Comcast, NBC Deal Almost Complete
Most people now reading
· Hit and run [General Questions]
· [Need Info] Looking for backup software... [Software]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· NO ONE knows what's wrong with my line! [TekSavvy]
· [WIN7] Outlook express under Windows 7? [Microsoft Help]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· [How to] Install Asterisk on an Asus WL-520GU router [VOIP Tech Chat]
· What is the spell hit cap for a lvl 80 full arcane spec mage [World of Warcraft]