<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Sprint should drop dead in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r21574145</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 16:12:53 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 16:12:53 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Sprint should drop dead</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21574145</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/342016"><b>dumwaldo</b></A> : I used to have Sprint with 5 lines of service spread across two separate accounts and none of the lines of service were obligated to a contract or subject to ETF. <br><br>I wanted to merge the lines into one account so I was forced to renew the contract I was under and renew the agreement for one other line as well. No new equipment was purchased and no subsidies were given.<br><br>Shortly after that I wanted to upgrade my phone at full retail price however Sprint informed me that THEY would no longer honor my existing contract if I purchased a new phone and I would now have to pay extra for services I currently had included in my contract.<br><br>I tried with great diligence three times and was refused all three times. Even though it was Sprint that was refusing to honor the contract, I still had to pay $400 to move to another carrier.<br><br>Screw Sprint and I hope they get sued into bankruptcy, they would completely deserve it.<br><br>DW]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21574145</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 22:30:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
