<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>A swing and a miss for Qwest in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r21580732</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 02:00:23 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 02:00:23 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>A swing and a miss for Qwest</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21580732</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/636879"><b>dustman81</b></A> : It's good that Qwest is starting to deploy FTTN, like AT&T is doing, but using ADSL2+ instead of VDSL is stupid.<br><br>At least AT&T did that right. So they can offer their users video, phone and high speed internet instead of just internet. Not only that, but AT&T's internet is cheaper, too. AT&T users can get 18Mbps/1.5Mbps for $65/mth. When AT&T starts deploying VDSL2+ and pair bonding, it's going to smoke whatever Qwest has.<br><br>It would have been nice for AT&T to have FTTH like Verizon FiOS, but it's still better than Qwest.<br><br>I don't what exec though that ADSL2+ was the way to go, but they are going to get beat by the cable companies, Verizon and AT&T.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21580732</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 15:39:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
