republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
634
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

rradina

join:2000-08-08
Chesterfield, MO

Are ISPs worried?

I don't think this has anything to do with network neutrality. In my opinion, ISP's are worried because of competitive issues. If two ISPs compete for customers and Google strikes a deal with one and not the other, one ISP now has a couple of advantages:
    • Better customer experience for Google content
    • Frees interconnect bandwidth (may improve customer experience for other content)

Of course the potential flaw in my thinking is to consider ISPs are in direct competition. Many folks don't have a choice for broadband.


jester121
Premium
join:2003-08-09
Lake Zurich, IL
Reviews:
·voip.ms

And if you're a local ISP struggling to compete, good luck getting Google's attention to set up a CDN on your network -- so your customers get slower service than the incumbent ISP.

Network neutrality is a lot like environmentalism -- everyone thinks it's a good idea but at what cost?


viperlmw
Premium
join:2005-01-25

said by jester121:

And if you're a local ISP struggling to compete, good luck getting Google's attention to set up a CDN on your network -- so your customers get slower service than the incumbent ISP.

Network neutrality is a lot like environmentalism -- everyone thinks it's a good idea but at what cost?
This is actually a very good point, IMHO.

rradina

join:2000-08-08
Chesterfield, MO

reply to jester121
Getting Google's attention; I totally agree and that was my point. However, I'm still struggling to see this as a network neutrality issue.


Friday, 01-Jun 09:18:18 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics