Re: More ISP B. S. in http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r21587140 en Sat, 28 Nov 2009 01:49:31 EDT Sat, 28 Nov 2009 01:49:31 EDT Re: More ISP B. S. http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21598636 anon :
said by Mr Matt See Profile :

At no time is Google streaming data as in TV over IP or Music/Voice over IP.
»www.youtube.com
»video.google.com]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21598636 Wed, 17 Dec 2008 19:12:20 EDT Re: More ISP B. S. http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21587230 swhitney2003 : No.

said by wifi4milez See Profile :

said by Desdinova See Profile :

Hey, it's real simple: if the network can't handle that kind of traffic, fine, then don't sell it to me.
The network can handle it fine, you just need to be paying for a higher class of service. Residential service is oversubscribed for a reason, and that is to keep the costs low. If you actually want to use 20+Mbps 24/7 I suggest you consider a T3, however depending on where you live be prepared to spend a couple thousand per month on it.
That should explain it all.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21587230 Mon, 15 Dec 2008 20:13:49 EDT Re: More ISP B. S. http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21587140 DJMASACRE :
said by swhitney2003 See Profile :

Get yourself a T3 line then. Residential broadband is not meant to be used 24/7 at full capacity.
are you fucking kidding ?

go back to dial up then . ]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21587140 Mon, 15 Dec 2008 20:01:18 EDT Re: More ISP B. S. http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21585606 Desdinova : Sorry, but I'm not the one breaking the rules or behaving inappropriately, the ISP is. If you sell me a level of service, I'm going to use what I pay for. If the ISP doesn't want it used that way then they have no business selling it. ]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21585606 Mon, 15 Dec 2008 15:46:18 EDT Re: More ISP B. S. http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21583992 wifi4milez :
said by Desdinova See Profile :

Hey, it's real simple: if the network can't handle that kind of traffic, fine, then don't sell it to me.
The network can handle it fine, you just need to be paying for a higher class of service. Residential service is oversubscribed for a reason, and that is to keep the costs low. If you actually want to use 20+Mbps 24/7 I suggest you consider a T3, however depending on where you live be prepared to spend a couple thousand per month on it.
--
Комитет государственной безопасности
]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21583992 Mon, 15 Dec 2008 10:40:12 EDT Re: More ISP B. S. http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21583811 swhitney2003 : Get yourself a T3 line then. Residential broadband is not meant to be used 24/7 at full capacity.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21583811 Mon, 15 Dec 2008 09:55:57 EDT Re: More ISP B. S. http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21583716 anon :
said by Desdinova See Profile :

You mean the folks like me who purchase service promising six megs down and two megs up 24/7 but then get lambasted and capped for actually trying to USE six down and two up for 24/7? Hey, it's real simple: if the network can't handle that kind of traffic, fine, then don't sell it to me.
Not the folks that purchase 6M and get 12M of service for the majority of their browsing experience. It is the entitled few that purchase 6M and download 100's of DVDs, Blueray and more content than they can possibly consume and then share it with millions of people that they do not even know.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21583716 Mon, 15 Dec 2008 09:30:54 EDT Re: More ISP B. S. http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21583648 Desdinova : "...extremely small fraction of very vocal users that feel they are entitled to unrealistic unlimited speed and unlimited usage which do not combine together with any service."

You mean the folks like me who purchase service promising six megs down and two megs up 24/7 but then get lambasted and capped for actually trying to USE six down and two up for 24/7? Hey, it's real simple: if the network can't handle that kind of traffic, fine, then don't sell it to me.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21583648 Mon, 15 Dec 2008 09:11:46 EDT Re: More ISP B. S. http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21583540 anon :
said by Mr Matt See Profile :


What are the ISP's complaining about. As I see it the fact that Google handles a large number of short transactions per day is a thorn in the ISP's side. The incumbent ISP's want you to pay for your connection to the internet and not use it. In this case the ISP's are wearing their pig suits.
This is so untrue. ISPs want to ensure solid customer experience with performance and regular speed increases. Prices for broadband have remained constant while performance and speeds have steadily increased year over year. The major complaints around ISP actions are from a extremely small fraction of very vocal users that feel they are entitled to unrealistic unlimited speed and unlimited usage which do not combine together with any service.

This is just more mob inciting reporting.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21583540 Mon, 15 Dec 2008 08:40:33 EDT More ISP B. S. http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21583498 Mr Matt : :mad: The ISP's are following the usual M. O. Blame the companies hosting the webpages. Users of the Google website are using the internet for it's intended purpose. Short transactions.
1) Customer requests a connection to Google's homepage.
2) Google downloads homepage.
3) Customer uploads request to Google.
4) Google downloads requested information.

At no time is Google streaming data as in TV over IP or Music/Voice over IP.

What are the ISP's complaining about. As I see it the fact that Google handles a large number of short transactions per day is a thorn in the ISP's side. The incumbent ISP's want you to pay for your connection to the internet and not use it. In this case the ISP's are wearing their pig suits.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21583498 Mon, 15 Dec 2008 08:25:32 EDT