site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
110
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


italiansmoke

join:2005-07-21
Monroe, MI

but...

like a poster said above, it should not be the be-all-end-all fix to congestion or P2P. It should just be a temporary fix to help people change their downloading habits, and help relieve the tension during peak times.

Caps & throttling suck any way you look at it. To compromise and accept throttling & caps is just going to make matters worse. We need to fight back, and not allow this kind of stuff if we want internet service to be how it's suppose to be. "You pay for this service, we give you our service. You get this service anytime, without interference & policing as long as you pay for it."

Or at least just stop the highest bandwidth hogs, or throttle them. Not ALL your customers. And certainly don't give me crap about congestion, and bandwidth limitations. That's why we pay them money. To use for these companies to upgrade their infrastructure and abilities. Not for this, that's for sure!

Thursday, 31-May 17:27:39 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics