 PolarBear03The bear formerly known as aaron8301Premium
join:2005-01-03 | reply to beaups
Re: Who cares about 3G I understand that, but the reason I have a cell phone is so it works all the time, wherever I go (and I travel a lot through many of the Western states I mentioned).
I guess there just aren't any people West of the Mississippi (except for right along the Pacific Coast). |
|
beaups
join:2003-08-11
Hilliard, OH | I am still not understanding your point. Are you telling me your tmobile phone works EVERYwhERE in the US? It doesn't. I believe AT&T's GSM network is also bigger than Tmobile's. I will dig for some coverage maps but from personal experience I can tell you TMO's coverage in rural ohio is awful. |
|
beaups
join:2003-08-11
Hilliard, OH | reply to PolarBear03
yep here is your super tmobile coverage map that works EVERYWHERE...
»www.gsmworld.com/cgi-bin/ni_map.···s&net=we |
|
beaups
join:2003-08-11
Hilliard, OH | corrected link
»www.gsmworld.com/cgi-bin/ni_map.···s&net=we |
|
PolarBear03The bear formerly known as aaron8301Premium
join:2005-01-03 | reply to beaups
said by beaups:I am still not understanding your point. The point of the article is that the iPhone has been unlocked, and can now be used on T-mo (at least in the US).
Some said that T-mo has worse 3G coverage that AT&T, and that the iPhone 3G won't work on T-mo 3G at all, because they use different frequencies.
And MY point is (that I thoroughly explained HERE) that even with no 3G, T-mo would be a better option.
--
How many assholes do we have on this ship, anyway?
YO!
I knew it. I'm surrounded by assholes. |
|
|
|
beaups
join:2003-08-11
Hilliard, OH | reply to beaups
and here is ATT
»www.gsmworld.com/cgi-bin/ni_map.···s&net=b3 |
|
beaups
join:2003-08-11
Hilliard, OH | reply to PolarBear03
you did, but the other problem is that tmobile also has WORSE GSM COVERAGE that AT&T. So no matter how you look at it, it works in LESS places. |
|
PolarBear03The bear formerly known as aaron8301Premium
join:2005-01-03 | reply to beaups
LMAO! That map you linked to looks to be from about 2004! Nice history lesson, though.
Maybe you should get information on T-mobile's coverage from T-mobile's webpage like I did. |
|
beaups
join:2003-08-11
Hilliard, OH | lol it said 2008...they both looked kinda sparse though  |
|
 ptrowskiGot Helix?Premium
join:2005-03-14
Putnam, CT
kudos:4
 ·VOIPo
| reply to PolarBear03
Compared to this. Even in your home state AT&T has more coverage. You pay more for better coverage.
Less coverage, less money. |
|
