site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


wifi4milez
Big Russ, 1918 to 2008. Rest in Peace

join:2004-08-07
New York, NY

reply to TheWickerMan

Re: Well, something will need to be done eventually....

said by TheWickerMan:

said by Packeteers:

actually, there is... charge money to send every email.
And since a lot of spammers use hijacked machines to send their crap out, that will accomplish nothing.
I think its the vast majority that do that. Charging per email will only be bothersome to legitimate users.
--
Комитет государственной безопасности


anon32bat

@rr.com

no charge for sending more then (insert number here) messages a second or smiler



Jason Levine
Premium
join:2001-07-13
USA

So you don't charge people for sending more e-mail? Wouldn't that let spammers off the hook entirely?

Or maybe you meant no charge for sending less than X messages per second. In this case, the spammers will just space out their messages. Suppose I'm a spammer. I have a zombie network of 10,000 machines at my disposal. If I have each machine send out 1 spam message every minute over 8 hours, I've sent out 4.8 million messages. As my zombie network grows, I can send out even more spam messages without triggering the "e-mail charge" system. And if I do trigger it, what do I care? The people who would be paying would be the owners of the zombied systems, not me.

Then there's the whole question of who gets the money. Charging per e-mail is not the solution.
--
-Jason Levine
Support a children's charity. Buy a calendar and/or a photo book. Shooting For A Cause


Thursday, 31-May 04:49:07 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics