site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

spectra

join:2000-07-21
Atlanta, GA

reply to dynodb

Re: It would be great

Dynodb,

I did not say their entire footprint is rural. I said other than a few large markets, it’s fairly (mostly) rural.

I have always claimed that the Phoenix, Denver, and Minneapolis are Qwest's largest markets. But those are their only real "large" markets. My definition of a “large” market would be an excess of 1-1.5 million in the surrounding metro. I’ve been to Tucson and SLC. They don’t feel like “large” cities because it so spread out, compared to a place like Baltimore (similar population size) or Philly where it’s really dense. FWIW, I grew up in the D.C. metro.

I’m inclined to not include Seattle or Portland as a market that Qwest can have 100% access to because they aren’t the only telco in those cities; VZ services significant portion of subscribers there. I'd say the Seattle area more so than Portland. I believe Omaha is the same, based on the fact that I have seen U-Verse reviews from people there. You probably know more about this than I do.

But unfortunately for Qwest, compared to Verizon and ATT regions, Qwest in general services areas which are low in population density and really just aren’t that big of metro areas. Verizon alone can make a fortune just by servicing the old Bell Atlantic/NYNEX areas. Then tack on Los Angeles/Orange County, Dallas/Fort Worth, Portland, Seattle to their footprint, and then you can really see how many customers they reach in a relatively small area. DSL, FTTH, and FTTN penetration rates are probably much higher because of the density of their respective regions.

In addition, household incomes are on average much higher in the areas where Verizon and ATT services; they can charge more, provide more services, etc.

I guess my point is, at this point in time, Qwest doesn’t seem attractive enough for Verizon or ATT. Those two are already taking on debt already from their own projects, they each have their own shareholders to please, and because of the economy, they aren’t likely to buy a company who isn’t in the greatest of financial health at the moment..

But It may change in the next couple years, who knows?

Monday, 13-Feb 06:02:37 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online! © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics