fiberguy
My views are my own.
Premium
join:2005-05-20
| reply to digitalfreak
Re: I've seen it.
Sure am! .. at that's because I have an opinion that differs than others.. get over it, baby huey.
News flash... this is a discussion board, not a bitching fest.. if you can't handle an opinion that differs that yours, may I suggest leggo land? |
|
digitalfreak
join:2005-12-09
49533
| reply to moby866
said by moby866  :You suck, please go die in a fire. Slowly. Just ignore the loser. He's one of a group of stooges who hang around here trying to get a rise out of people. |
|
moby866
Premium
join:2000-10-07
Above you | reply to fiberguy
You suck, please go die in a fire. Slowly. |
|
fiberguy
My views are my own.
Premium
join:2005-05-20 | reply to qworster
How do I think you came up with it?
you're an angry bitter person with nothing better to do than to make up a stupid name and bash companies on line instead of putting your time to better use?
.. just a hunch. |
|
qworster
join:2001-11-25
Los Angeles, CA
 ·DSL EXTREME
·Brand X Internet
 ·RoadRunner Cable
 ·Vonage
1 edit | reply to fiberguy
said by fiberguy :Hmmm.. take the word of a phone tech who puts their hands on the equipment, and puts forth a reason why,..... or you, who comes in here with such a powerful and convincing post simply saying "you are wrong".. .. any guess where my money goes? How goes it in Los Angeles, CA - the land of AT&T and not Qwest? So now you are claiming that allowing the CLECs access to the DSLAM located in the FTTN Remote Terminal would NOT level the playing field? How does that logic work?
PS: I lived in Tucson for years. I suffered at the hand of Qwest. How do you think I came up with the handle qworster? |
|
