<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: Not Competitive&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Not-Competitive-21617951</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:31:38 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:31:38 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Not Competitive</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Not-Competitive-21618933</link>
<description><![CDATA[hottboiinnc posted : same here after sitting and reviewing everything cent by cent. <br><br>And the $5 after the first TV and that alone will kill you if you have more than 2 TVs let alone add the price of the 'Net.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Not-Competitive-21618933</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 22:29:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Not Competitive</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Not-Competitive-21617951</link>
<description><![CDATA[dlathem posted : The price structure I have seen for U-VERSE does not look competitive with my current cable provider.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Not-Competitive-21617951</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 18:40:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

