Re: YouTube technically doesn't have to pay them a dime - NOT

Duo Maxwell What? Stop Looking At Me Like That join:2003-03-31 Racine, WI	reply to Kearnstd Re: YouTube technically doesn't have to pay them a dime - NOT Ditto, Google is the one that should be laughing all the way to the bank.
	to forum · permalink · · 2008-12-23 01:38:42 ·
Kearnstd Elf Wizard Premium join:2002-01-22 Mullica Hill, NJ	reply to TKJunkMail said by TKJunkMail : YouTube technically doesn't have to pay them a dime When YouTube sells ads attached to the music videos, they gave up their safe harbor provisions. So Warner is due compensation for YouTube hosting their music. no YouTube is due money from Warner for hosting their ads for the artists they sign.(err i mean Music Videos) i think the whole royalties thing with Youtube is TOTALLY being done wrong because Google is basicly providing mass video ads and is expected to pay the record company when the record company should be paying Google for hosting their advertisement(and dont try and tell me a music video isnt just a fancy ad for the album). -- [65 Arcanist]Filan(High Elf) Zone: Broadband Reports
	to forum · permalink · · 2008-12-22 12:42:47 ·


Tuesday, 01-Dec 05:39:35	Terms of Use \| Privacy Policy \| Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo \| feedback \| contact over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole page compression OFF