http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Confidential-agreement-21622595 en Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:42:31 EDT Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:42:31 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Confidential-agreement-21633135 said by jmr50:

Confidential because Cogent wanted settlement-free but didn't get it. Sprint, for its part, likely agreed to accept some subset of what it would charge for transit to do a paid peering arrangement. Cogent saves face, Sprint gets paid. Everyone's happy.
A more likely outcome..
Sprint got zilch and doesn't want to advertise it..
It was Sprint customers who requested Content from servers hosted on Cogent connectivity.. ]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Confidential-agreement-21633135 Wed, 24 Dec 2008 17:35:53 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Confidential-agreement-21625835 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Confidential-agreement-21625835 Tue, 23 Dec 2008 09:54:57 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Confidential-agreement-21622595
Sorry, the sexual refrence is from the title "Cogent, Sprint Kiss, Make Up" and in the article "...how simple carrier lovers' quarrels...".

:D]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Confidential-agreement-21622595 Mon, 22 Dec 2008 17:24:59 EDT