The linked article makes no reference to child porn or porn of any kind. It merely states content "unsuitable for children". Maybe stealing isn't a suitable activity for children? Now who is perverting the issue here?
It merely states content "unsuitable for children". Maybe stealing isn't a suitable activity for children?
Yeah, but how exactly are the going to make the filter stop children from learning about being a politician, exactly? -- "Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power." -- Benito Mussolini
The linked article makes no reference to child porn or porn of any kind. It merely states content "unsuitable for children". Maybe stealing isn't a suitable activity for children? Now who is perverting the issue here?
I remember previous articles about the Aussie Cyber-Safety filtering program had various people saying people agianst it were in favor of child porn. Also the first link has a mention of Child Porn also being the rallying horn behind the call for deep packet inspection in the U.S.
I really don't care enough about your opinion to take 2 seconds to support my claims with more links, so think whatever you like.
reply to beaups It does reference child pron, just read this topic, I'm not going to reprint all that.
The issue of children is just the tip of the iceberg, centralized filtering has a lot more issues than you not doing a little research about the link it is commenting on. Not going off at you, it all just annoys me they think this will be the answer for the issues on the internet. -- The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing - Edmund Burke
·
