<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Downstream is nice but.... in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r21632075</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 05:55:56 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 05:55:56 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Downstream is nice but....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21650078</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/856021"><b>johan_hammy</b></A> : You can figure that 802.11 ABG will do 1/2 of their rated speed in actual throughput.  I'm not sure on 802.11 N.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21650078</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 10:28:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Downstream is nice but....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21637122</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1105113"><b>aaronwt</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  en102 <A HREF="/useremail/u/297537"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>   :</small><br><br>Beyond that ... many wireless routers - unless 'N' or better, are 54 or 108Mbps - and that doesn't include overhead.<br>Many wireless routers also have 100Mbps ports (haven't seen many that have GigE ports attached, unless they're the WAN port.<br> </div>Just the opposite for me. My last three wireless routers each had 4 gigabit ports. And my current one is the first router I've owned that has a gigabit WAN port.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21637122</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2008 22:34:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Downstream is nice but....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21636806</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1440579"><b>iansltx</b></A> : My WRT310N is gigabit, but only on the LAN side (seriously). Then again, it's a $90 router.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21636806</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2008 20:49:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Downstream is nice but....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21634188</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/129458"><b>KrK</b></A> : nm.  :D]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21634188</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 22:47:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Downstream is nice but....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21633861</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/377729"><b>dvd536</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  dadkins <A HREF="/useremail/u/879997"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  Cheese <A HREF="/useremail/u/891765"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  baineschile <A HREF="/useremail/u/1550577"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br>100mbs is a tough thing to do. Not necessarly technically, but people are always expecting improvement in the internet speed area.<br><br>After 100mbs, it gets sticky. 99% of all ethernet cards out there are rated at 100, which means they cant get any higher than that. People would have to upgrade TONS of personal equipment (not only multiple aspects of hardware, but some OS software too) to get above 100.<br> </div>And most of the newer computers/cards have gigabit and that is becoming standard.<br> </div>My 4 1/2 year old laptop has a gigabit NIC.  :)<br> </div>So does my cheapa$$ compaq i got at wal*mart.<br><small>--<br>When I gez aju zavateh na nalechoo more new yonooz tonigh molinigh - Ken Lee</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21633861</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 21:07:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Downstream is nice but....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21633101</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : I'm not in the Alexa top 500.  And I'm plugged in to gigE and not colo'ed.  :)<br><br>And why do you assume I'd only have one connection going at any given time?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21633101</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 20:38:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Downstream is nice but....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21632652</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Mine is plugged into a burstable 1G port.... (colocated)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21632652</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 17:01:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Downstream is nice but....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21632780</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/297537"><b>en102</b></A> : Beyond that ... many wireless routers - unless 'N' or better, are 54 or 108Mbps - and that doesn't include overhead.<br>Many wireless routers also have 100Mbps ports (haven't seen many that have GigE ports attached, unless they're the WAN port.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21632780</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 16:13:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Downstream is nice but....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21632231</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/611909"><b>patcat88</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  baineschile <A HREF="/useremail/u/1550577"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>100mbs is a tough thing to do. Not necessarly technically, but people are always expecting improvement in the internet speed area.<br> </div>Unless your in the Alexa top 500, your server is plugged into a 100 mbit port at the colo place, so over 100mbit is pointless.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21632231</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 13:57:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Downstream is nice but....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21632075</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1105113"><b>aaronwt</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  dadkins <A HREF="/useremail/u/879997"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  Cheese <A HREF="/useremail/u/891765"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  baineschile <A HREF="/useremail/u/1550577"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br>100mbs is a tough thing to do. Not necessarly technically, but people are always expecting improvement in the internet speed area.<br><br>After 100mbs, it gets sticky. 99% of all ethernet cards out there are rated at 100, which means they cant get any higher than that. People would have to upgrade TONS of personal equipment (not only multiple aspects of hardware, but some OS software too) to get above 100.<br> </div>And most of the newer computers/cards have gigabit and that is becoming standard.<br> </div>My 4 1/2 year old laptop has a gigabit NIC.  :)<br> </div>I've been using Gigabit since 2001.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21632075</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 13:19:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Downstream is nice but....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21631894</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/891765"><b>Cheese</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  andrewhaji <A HREF="/useremail/u/593899"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  elios <A HREF="/useremail/u/1290198"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br>and yea show me any PC made in the last 10 years that DIDNT have atlest a 10/100 nic in it</div>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.apple.com/macbookair/" >www.apple.com/macbookair/</A><br><br>(I know, you can purchase an Ethernet dongle, but still, it doesn't come with it built-in.)<br> </div>PC! Not Mac!  ;) :p]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21631894</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 12:42:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Downstream is nice but....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21631865</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/593899"><b>andrewhaji</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  elios <A HREF="/useremail/u/1290198"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>and yea show me any PC made in the last 10 years that DIDNT have atlest a 10/100 nic in it</div>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.apple.com/macbookair/" >www.apple.com/macbookair/</A><br><br>(I know, you can purchase an Ethernet dongle, but still, it doesn't come with it built-in.)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21631865</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 12:38:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Downstream is nice but....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21631419</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1590874"><b>DarkLogix</b></A> : Wow great now can LUS bring internet service to baytown?<br><br>50/50 wow great Comcast take note if you don't provide better service and fewer bonuses to your VP's you'll be in the dust]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21631419</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 11:14:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Downstream is nice but....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21631268</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/879997"><b>dadkins</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Cheese <A HREF="/useremail/u/891765"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  baineschile <A HREF="/useremail/u/1550577"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br>100mbs is a tough thing to do. Not necessarly technically, but people are always expecting improvement in the internet speed area.<br><br>After 100mbs, it gets sticky. 99% of all ethernet cards out there are rated at 100, which means they cant get any higher than that. People would have to upgrade TONS of personal equipment (not only multiple aspects of hardware, but some OS software too) to get above 100.<br> </div>And most of the newer computers/cards have gigabit and that is becoming standard.<br> </div>My 4 1/2 year old laptop has a gigabit NIC.  :)<br><small>--<br>Think outside the Fox... <A HREF="http://www.opera.com/">Opera</a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21631268</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 10:44:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Downstream is nice but....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21631230</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1290198"><b>elios</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  baineschile <A HREF="/useremail/u/1550577"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>100mbs is a tough thing to do. Not necessarly technically, but people are always expecting improvement in the internet speed area.<br><br>After 100mbs, it gets sticky. 99% of all ethernet cards out there are rated at 100, which means they cant get any higher than that. People would have to upgrade TONS of personal equipment (not only multiple aspects of hardware, but some OS software too) to get above 100.<br> </div>i think you MISSED that WITH IN THE NETWORK thing<br>so you cant pull all 100Mbps who cares its like being on any 100Mbps lan but you can share stuff with your buddies down the street at full wire speed <br><br>and yea show me any PC made in the last 10 years that DIDNT have atlest a 10/100 nic in it]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21631230</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 10:39:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Downstream is nice but....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21631210</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/891765"><b>Cheese</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  baineschile <A HREF="/useremail/u/1550577"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>100mbs is a tough thing to do. Not necessarly technically, but people are always expecting improvement in the internet speed area.<br><br>After 100mbs, it gets sticky. 99% of all ethernet cards out there are rated at 100, which means they cant get any higher than that. People would have to upgrade TONS of personal equipment (not only multiple aspects of hardware, but some OS software too) to get above 100.<br> </div>And most of the newer computers/cards have gigabit and that is becoming standard.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21631210</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 10:35:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Downstream is nice but....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21631198</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1550577"><b>baineschile</b></A> : 100mbs is a tough thing to do. Not necessarly technically, but people are always expecting improvement in the internet speed area.<br><br>After 100mbs, it gets sticky. 99% of all ethernet cards out there are rated at 100, which means they cant get any higher than that. People would have to upgrade TONS of personal equipment (not only multiple aspects of hardware, but some OS software too) to get above 100.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21631198</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 10:32:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Downstream is nice but....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21631147</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/567879"><b>Kearnstd</b></A> : AT&T and Cox are screwed Nether one can compete with the 137 triple play.  Uverse physically cannot deliver 30/30 while delivering HD and telephone and i doubt Cox would deploy DOCSIS 3 just to sink this.<br><small>--<br>[65 Arcanist]Filan(High Elf) Zone: Broadband Reports</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21631147</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 10:23:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Downstream is nice but....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21631089</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1290198"><b>elios</b></A> : if they can make this work WOW<br>also NICE 100Mbps with in the network <br>i have always wondered why cable or even Verizon didnt do this with fiber ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21631089</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 10:13:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Downstream is nice but....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21631038</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/891765"><b>Cheese</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  vic102482 <A HREF="/useremail/u/624188"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Symmetrical/same upload download. :) (NICE!)<br> </div>Oh damn! Niceeeeee  :D]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21631038</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 10:05:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Downstream is nice but....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21631035</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/141383"><b>Karl Bode</b></A> : They're symmetrical tiers, from what I've seen so far.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21631035</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 10:05:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Downstream is nice but....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21631026</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/624188"><b>vic102482</b></A> : Symmetrical/all plans same upload download. :) (NICE!)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21631026</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 10:04:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Downstream is nice but....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21631011</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/891765"><b>Cheese</b></A> : What is the upload speed?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21631011</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 10:01:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
