<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Lets take our privacy back with encryption in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r21638478</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:47:24 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:47:24 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Lets take our privacy back with encryption</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21639744</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1522676"><b>jsz0</b></A> : It won't really help much. You can presently encrypt just about any traffic (including BitTorrent) but ultimately in the case of BT you need peers to exchange data with and those peers need a way of finding each other. As long as that is the case the RIAA/MPAA/etc can simply signup for the site just like anyone else and get the data they need. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21639744</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 17:30:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Lets take our privacy back with encryption</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21638756</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/888792"><b>Underplay</b></A> : What we need is a standardized encryption protocol for all protocol's. It should be as easy as cake to just include a library and not have to worry about different encryptions being used...Although it would be hard.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21638756</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 13:13:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Lets take our privacy back with encryption</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21638699</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1175917"><b>k1ll3rdr4g0n</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Underplay <A HREF="/useremail/u/888792"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Alright it seems like these guys wont leave our personal rights alone, this is the invasion of privacy and we need to start developing more encrypted protocols to keep these nosy people out of our business. Start encrypting EVERY BIT.<br> </div>I wish. But, for whatever reason we created SSL to be 'vulnerable'. Even though I don't see it as such, every browser maker makes self signed certs as a virus.<br>Until we can embrace self-signed SSL or make 'ESSL' (enhanced SSL), our data wont be encrypted. There are papers written on how insecure self-signed SSL certs are, but what is SSL's real purpose? To provide an encryption between 2 parties. <br>SSL is 'broken', any bad guy can buy a certificate pretending to be from a certain domain. So, even CA signed certs are vulnerable from MITM attacks.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21638699</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 12:57:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lets take our privacy back with encryption</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21638478</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/888792"><b>Underplay</b></A> : Alright it seems like these guys wont leave our personal rights alone, this is the invasion of privacy and we need to start developing more encrypted protocols to keep these nosy people out of our business. Start encrypting EVERY BIT.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21638478</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 11:58:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
