site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


jjoshua
Premium
join:2001-06-01
Scotch Plains, NJ
kudos:1

reply to MrHappy316

Re: Other Repercussions

said by MrHappy316:

A couple of lawsuits should straighten it out to make ISP seek shelter in the dump pipe theory.
Good answer. If ISPs are filtering my connection for illegal material, then they are responsible if a virus infects my computer. If they let it through, then it must be ok, right?

MrHappy316
Wish I had my tank
Premium
join:2003-01-02
Summerville, SC

Never thought about the good old virus, spam and email scams. ISP's could really be hosed with this idea.



Anonymous_
Anonymous
Premium
join:2004-06-21
127.0.0.1
kudos:2
Reviews:
·RoadRunner Cable
·Comcast
·Time Warner VOIP

4 edits

reply to jjoshua

said by jjoshua:

said by MrHappy316:

A couple of lawsuits should straighten it out to make ISP seek shelter in the dump pipe theory.
Good answer. If ISPs are filtering my connection for illegal material, then they are responsible if a virus infects my computer. If they let it through, then it must be ok, right?
man they would get sued so fast

as far as i know it's illegal to impersonate a cop

Deep packet inspection is also illegal as as it volates (The Fourth Amendment)

The Fourth Amendment specifies that any warrant must be judicially sanctioned for a search or an arrest, in order for such a warrant to be considered reasonable. Warrants must be supported by probable cause and be limited in scope according to specific information supplied by a person (usually a peace officer ) who has sworn by it and is therefore accountable to the issuing court.

Thursday, 31-May 17:52:29 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics