site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
229
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


texans20
Premium
join:2002-09-28
Texas!

Let it die

Please, it's a bad idea let it stay dead.


NetAdmin1
CCNA

join:2008-05-22

said by texans20:

Please, it's a bad idea let it stay dead.
Or at least drop the "smut free" part of it.
--
"This is a bus. You know how big a bus is?"

Skippy25

join:2000-09-13
Hazelwood, MO

I would agree, drop the smut free part and don't allow the big 4 wireless players to bid or buy any company that wins it for the 10 years they have to deploy it.


ISurfTooMuch

join:2007-04-23
Tuscaloosa, AL

reply to NetAdmin1
I agree. The government has no business telling people what they can and can't see online. I'd have no problem with a requirement that the operator offer filtering to those who ask for it, but I don't like mandated filtering one bit.

And for those who say that the government has a right to ask for mandated filtering in exchange for the right to use the spectrum, which is a public resource, it isn't a great stretch for the federal or local governments to demand the same concessions to allow companies to use public rights-of-way to build wired networks. Once you let the censorship genie out of the bottle, it'll be almost impossible to get it back in.


Thursday, 31-May 18:07:30 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics