Re: Already Exists in http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r21651632 en Tue, 01 Dec 2009 11:09:07 EDT Tue, 01 Dec 2009 11:09:07 EDT Re: Already Exists http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21651632 funchords :
said by BF69 See Profile :

See that actually required parents to be well.... parents. Many people just want to #### and if kids come along let the governemnt take care of them.
I'd hit the "hey mods" button and complain but I'm afraid the Internet would simply crash in the irony of it all. :) :D :o ;) :p
--
Robb Topolski -= funchords.com =- Hillsboro, Oregon -- KJ7RL
What you do at Christmas does not matter so much; What counts are the Christmas things you do all year through.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21651632 Mon, 29 Dec 2008 16:13:31 EDT Re: Already Exists http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21651442 BF69 :
said by jmn1207 See Profile :

Don't they already have 3rd party applications that people can use to filter content? Stuff like Net Nanny already provide children-friendly sites and age-specific ratings.

If they ever develop this silly rating system, where can I get a list of the filtered sites? These are the sites I want to visit. :p :D
See that actually required parents to be well.... parents. Many people just want to fuck and if kids come along let the governemnt take care of them.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21651442 Mon, 29 Dec 2008 15:30:58 EDT Re: Already Exists http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21650799 jmn1207 : The problem I have is not with the filtering methodology, but the proposal to force ISP's to offer this to customers. Like I said, these already exists for those people interested in some type of internet morality shield, I don't want the ISP to be anything more than a provider for a dumb pipe. ]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21650799 Mon, 29 Dec 2008 13:06:38 EDT Re: Already Exists http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21650625 RARPSL :
said by jmn1207 See Profile :

Don't they already have 3rd party applications that people can use to filter content? Stuff like Net Nanny already provide children-friendly sites and age-specific ratings.

If they ever develop this silly rating system, where can I get a list of the filtered sites? These are the sites I want to visit. :p :D
Net Nanny/etc. have the same problem as this proposal when it comes to the list being subject to someone-else's 'what you can not see' agenda. As to getting NN's or the proposal's list of what is being blocked (or even the blocking criteria) that is secret (to prevent the censor from having to identify their bias/agenda).]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21650625 Mon, 29 Dec 2008 12:24:01 EDT Already Exists http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21650524 jmn1207 : Don't they already have 3rd party applications that people can use to filter content? Stuff like Net Nanny already provide children-friendly sites and age-specific ratings.

If they ever develop this silly rating system, where can I get a list of the filtered sites? These are the sites I want to visit. :p :D]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21650524 Mon, 29 Dec 2008 12:06:00 EDT