RadioDoc58ef2c0Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11
1 edit | reply to stevech0
Re: Ham Radio and ATT "U-Verse" IPTV-Internet-Phone Problems Hmmm...AT&T UVerse does not overlap coverage areas with FiOS. Cable does quite nicely using their '30 year old wires".
As any Ham should know, the FCC considers anything that is not supposed to be a radio receiver that acts like one to be malfunctioning. This includes things like DSL modems, phones, and set top boxes. The transmitter operator is off the hook for interference to such devices once they can verify that the transmitter is operating correctly and within FCC spurious radiation limits.
While it can strain neighborhood relations, the best (and really, only) solution is precisely what was outlined above: Be nice, assist in directing the complainant to proper resources (read: AT&T) and cooperate in any testing required to reach a solution. |
 PiggieI Actually use WindstreamPremium
join:2005-11-23
Orange Springs, FL | Cooperation between hams and neighbors is key. My high power operations down at those freqs predates DSL.
But I sure got my quota of complaints eating up peoples cable TV. 9 times out of 10 back them, if I replaced any push on F-connectors with crimp (before compression), tightened the connections, it all went away. A couple of times the cable company had to find the bad connection on their lines.
Point is like RD says, those old cable lines are for the most part still working fine.
Recently I had a trouble with some 30 plus year old lines interfering with me on HB OTA TV. They came out and found old connectors, replaced them. Fixed the problem.
If you start a war you will have a war. If you cooperate you will have a solution! And it sounds like ATT has work to do.
--
| Speedstream 4200 Modem - 3m/384 plan | W98-W2KSP4-XPSP2 - All AMD | Buffalo WHR G54S with Tomato 1.18 | 3 downstream switches feeding 6 total clients (no wireless) | Including the Data port on the side of my neck | |
