TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ |  This system would have worse latency than planes using 3g
If this would ever be implemented, it is kind of funny that trains on the ground would have worse latency than planes would have that are now implementing 3G systems. |
|
Karl Bode
News Guy
join:2000-03-02 | Was thinking the same thing... |
|
RadioDoc
58ef2c0
Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11
 ·AT&T Midwest
| reply to TKJunkMail
Let's see those airplane 3G systems working over the middle of the Atlantic Ocean...
Similar issue with using terrestrial cell system design for trains in the middle of nowhere. Or in a car for that matter. No coverage.
--
Toolmaster of La Grange. |
|
TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
 ·Sprint Mobile Broa..
 ·Comcast
| said by RadioDoc  :Let's see those airplane 3G systems working over the middle of the Atlantic Ocean... Similar issue with using terrestrial cell system design for trains in the middle of nowhere. Or in a car for that matter. No coverage. Actually, train travelers have access to cell towers almost everywhere. And that is because major rail corridors are parallel to major highways(the rail corridors came 1st). And major highways are almost totally covered by cell towers in the US.
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page
Ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk? |
|
RadioDoc
58ef2c0
Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11 | In the US, maybe east of the Mississippi. In Europe, not so much.
--
Toolmaster of La Grange. |
|
natter
join:2000-12-18
Littleton, CO
| I just drove from Colorado to California and back. Although I had cell coverage most of the way with my iPhone, probably 70%+ of the time, I couldn't even pull email/surf even though I had almost full bars. Talking and SMS would work great, it's just the data was useless. (this was on EDGE and 3G) |
|
RR Conductor
RailRoadDude
Premium
join:2002-04-02
Redwood Valley, CA
·Comcast
4 edits | reply to TKJunkMail
said by TKJunkMail :said by RadioDoc :Let's see those airplane 3G systems working over the middle of the Atlantic Ocean... Similar issue with using terrestrial cell system design for trains in the middle of nowhere. Or in a car for that matter. No coverage. Actually, train travelers have access to cell towers almost everywhere. And that is because major rail corridors are parallel to major highways(the rail corridors came 1st). And major highways are almost totally covered by cell towers in the US. While most commuter and short distance train routes are well covered (even here in the west), there are still plenty of places, especially on the long distance trains where you will lose cell service. For example, many of the long distance routes in the west, ie.the Coast Starlight, California Zephyr, Empire Builder, Sunset Limited, Texas Eagle, Southwest Chief, Pioneer, Desert Wind, have several places where they are out of cell range. A highway nearby does not always mean a cell signal  Something like this, especially here in the west would be awesome!
--
»www.amtrak.com
»www.amtrakcalifornia.com
»www.metrolinktrains.com
»www.narprail.org
»www.freightrailworks.org
»www.up.com
»www.bnsf.com
»www.northcoastrailroad.org
»www.sonomamarintrain.org |
|
DarkLogix
join:2008-10-23
Baytown, TX | reply to Karl Bode
Ya why not some kinda Hybrid system
when in range of a cell tower use that but when not then use sat |
|
james
join:2001-02-26
antarctica
| reply to RadioDoc
said by RadioDoc :Let's see those airplane 3G systems working over the middle of the Atlantic Ocean... Lets see a train mounted system work there!  |
|
Cjaiceman
Premium,MVM
join:2004-10-12
Parker, CO
·Comcast Workplace
·Comcast
| reply to natter
said by natter :I just drove from Colorado to California and back. Although I had cell coverage most of the way with my iPhone, probably 70%+ of the time, I couldn't even pull email/surf even though I had almost full bars. Talking and SMS would work great, it's just the data was useless. (this was on EDGE and 3G) If you went through Wyoming that is because in Wyoming you are on a partner network, which does not allow ANY data. Texting and voice work, but there is not enough bandwidth to allow data, would be nice though. Then there are parts of Nevada that are on partner networks as well that I could also not pull any data. When I was on AT&T's network I could pull data just fine. |
|
NwkEWR
Spare Me the Socialist B.S.
Premium
join:2002-04-10
Newark, NJ
·AT&T Yahoo
 ·Vonage
·Optimum Online
| reply to james
said by james :said by RadioDoc :Let's see those airplane 3G systems working over the middle of the Atlantic Ocean... Lets see a train mounted system work there! James, you stole my idea, I'm suing. 
--
BEWARE: "We can't expect the American people to jump from Capitalism to Communism, but we can assist their elected leaders in giving them small doses of Socialism, until they awaken one day to find that they have Communism." - Nikita Khrushchev - |
|
Richard B
Fur It Up
join:2007-06-22
Portland, OR | reply to TKJunkMail
Not so fast, the Cascadia train between Portland,OR and Seattle passes through a rural areas. Add to that there are a lot of cell phone gaps on the I-5 if G3 was offered it would be spotty at best. We in the West are not dense as the East Coast. |
|
TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast
| said by Richard B : We in the West are not dense as the East Coast. Oh, I don't know. I'd say there is significant denseness on the left coast.
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page
Ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk? |
|
NormanS
Premium,MVM
join:2001-02-14
San Jose, CA | There is definitely a significant "leftness"!  |
|
