<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: This system would have worse latency than planes using 3g&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-This-system-would-have-worse-latency-than-planes-using-3g-21655133</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 23:27:41 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 23:27:41 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: This system would have worse latency than planes using 3g</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-This-system-would-have-worse-latency-than-planes-using-3g-21659469</link>
<description><![CDATA[NormanS posted : There is definitely a significant "leftness"!  :(]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-This-system-would-have-worse-latency-than-planes-using-3g-21659469</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 06:19:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: This system would have worse latency than planes using 3g</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-This-system-would-have-worse-latency-than-planes-using-3g-21657850</link>
<description><![CDATA[ThrowDemsOut posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1465905" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1465905');">Scatcatpdx</a>:</small><br><br> We in the West are not dense as the East Coast.  <br> </div>Oh, I don't know. I'd say there is significant <A HREF="http://www.wordwebonline.com/en/DENSENESS">denseness</a> on the left coast. ;) :D<br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/bqv2h"><b>My BLOG ..</b></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/2a9xcb"><i> .. Internet News ..</i></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/yz8xto"><b> .. My Web Page</b></a><br>Ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk?</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-This-system-would-have-worse-latency-than-planes-using-3g-21657850</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 20:10:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: This system would have worse latency than planes using 3g</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-This-system-would-have-worse-latency-than-planes-using-3g-21657813</link>
<description><![CDATA[Scatcatpdx posted : Not so fast, the Cascadia train between Portland,OR and Seattle  passes through a rural areas. Add to that there are a lot of cell phone gaps on the I-5 if G3 was offered it would be spotty at best. We in the West are not dense as the East Coast.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-This-system-would-have-worse-latency-than-planes-using-3g-21657813</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 20:02:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: This system would have worse latency than planes using 3g</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-This-system-would-have-worse-latency-than-planes-using-3g-21657225</link>
<description><![CDATA[NwkEWR posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/326902" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=326902');">james</a>:</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/157889" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=157889');">RadioDoc</a>:</small><br><br>Let's see those airplane 3G systems working over the middle of the Atlantic Ocean...<br> </div>Lets see a train mounted system work there! :D<br> </div>James, you stole my idea, I'm suing.   :mad:<br><small>--<br>BEWARE: "We can't expect the American people to jump from Capitalism to Communism, but we can assist their elected leaders in giving them small doses of Socialism, until they awaken one day to find that they have Communism." - Nikita Khrushchev -</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-This-system-would-have-worse-latency-than-planes-using-3g-21657225</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 17:56:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: This system would have worse latency than planes using 3g</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-This-system-would-have-worse-latency-than-planes-using-3g-21656258</link>
<description><![CDATA[Cjaiceman posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/266189" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=266189');">natter</a>:</small><br><br>I just drove from Colorado to California and back. Although I had cell coverage most of the way with my iPhone, probably 70%+ of the time, I couldn't even pull email/surf even though I had almost full bars. Talking and SMS would work great, it's just the data was useless. (this was on EDGE and 3G)<br> </div>If you went through Wyoming that is because in Wyoming you are on a partner network, which does not allow ANY data. Texting and voice work, but there is not enough bandwidth to allow data, would be nice though. Then there are parts of Nevada that are on partner networks as well that I could also not pull any data. When I was on AT&T's network I could pull data just fine.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-This-system-would-have-worse-latency-than-planes-using-3g-21656258</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 14:40:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: This system would have worse latency than planes using 3g</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-This-system-would-have-worse-latency-than-planes-using-3g-21656242</link>
<description><![CDATA[james posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/157889" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=157889');">RadioDoc</a>:</small><br><br>Let's see those airplane 3G systems working over the middle of the Atlantic Ocean...<br> </div>Lets see a train mounted system work there! :D]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-This-system-would-have-worse-latency-than-planes-using-3g-21656242</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 14:36:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: This system would have worse latency than planes using 3g</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-This-system-would-have-worse-latency-than-planes-using-3g-21655748</link>
<description><![CDATA[DarkLogix posted : Ya why not some kinda Hybrid system<br>when in range of a cell tower use that but when not then use sat]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-This-system-would-have-worse-latency-than-planes-using-3g-21655748</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 12:50:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: This system would have worse latency than planes using 3g</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-This-system-would-have-worse-latency-than-planes-using-3g-21655509</link>
<description><![CDATA[RR Conductor posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/594412" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=594412');">ThrowDemsOut</a>:</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/157889" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=157889');">RadioDoc</a>:</small><br><br>Let's see those airplane 3G systems working over the middle of the Atlantic Ocean...<br><br>Similar issue with using terrestrial cell system design for trains in the middle of nowhere.  Or in a car for that matter.  No coverage.<br> </div>Actually, train travelers have access to cell towers almost everywhere. And that is because major rail corridors are parallel to major highways(the rail corridors came 1st). And major highways are almost totally covered by cell towers in the US. <br> </div>While most commuter and short distance train routes are well covered (even here in the west), there are still plenty of places, especially on the long distance trains where you will lose cell service.  For example, many of the long distance routes in the west, ie.the Coast Starlight, California Zephyr, Empire Builder, Sunset Limited, Texas Eagle, Southwest Chief, Pioneer, Desert Wind, have several places where they are out of cell range.  A highway nearby does not always mean a cell signal ;)  Something like this, especially here in the west would be awesome!<br><br><small>--<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.amtrak.com" >www.amtrak.com</A><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.amtrakcalifornia.com" >www.amtrakcalifornia.com</A><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.metrolinktrains.com" >www.metrolinktrains.com</A><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.narprail.org" >www.narprail.org</A><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.freightrailworks.org" >www.freightrailworks.org</A><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.up.com" >www.up.com</A><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.bnsf.com" >www.bnsf.com</A><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.northcoastrailroad.org" >www.northcoastrailroad.org</A><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.sonomamarintrain.org" >www.sonomamarintrain.org</A></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-This-system-would-have-worse-latency-than-planes-using-3g-21655509</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 11:54:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: This system would have worse latency than planes using 3g</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-This-system-would-have-worse-latency-than-planes-using-3g-21655459</link>
<description><![CDATA[natter posted : I just drove from Colorado to California and back. Although I had cell coverage most of the way with my iPhone, probably 70%+ of the time, I couldn't even pull email/surf even though I had almost full bars. Talking and SMS would work great, it's just the data was useless. (this was on EDGE and 3G)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-This-system-would-have-worse-latency-than-planes-using-3g-21655459</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 11:43:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: This system would have worse latency than planes using 3g</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-This-system-would-have-worse-latency-than-planes-using-3g-21655422</link>
<description><![CDATA[RadioDoc posted : In the US, maybe east of the Mississippi.  In Europe, not so much.<br><small>--<br>Toolmaster of La Grange.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-This-system-would-have-worse-latency-than-planes-using-3g-21655422</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 11:35:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: This system would have worse latency than planes using 3g</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-This-system-would-have-worse-latency-than-planes-using-3g-21655400</link>
<description><![CDATA[ThrowDemsOut posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/157889" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=157889');">RadioDoc</a>:</small><br><br>Let's see those airplane 3G systems working over the middle of the Atlantic Ocean...<br><br>Similar issue with using terrestrial cell system design for trains in the middle of nowhere.  Or in a car for that matter.  No coverage.<br> </div>Actually, train travelers have access to cell towers almost everywhere. And that is because major rail corridors are parallel to major highways(the rail corridors came 1st). And major highways are almost totally covered by cell towers in the US. <br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/bqv2h"><b>My BLOG ..</b></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/2a9xcb"><i> .. Internet News ..</i></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/yz8xto"><b> .. My Web Page</b></a><br>Ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk?</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-This-system-would-have-worse-latency-than-planes-using-3g-21655400</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 11:29:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: This system would have worse latency than planes using 3g</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-This-system-would-have-worse-latency-than-planes-using-3g-21655380</link>
<description><![CDATA[RadioDoc posted : Let's see those airplane 3G systems working over the middle of the Atlantic Ocean...<br><br>Similar issue with using terrestrial cell system design for trains in the middle of nowhere.  Or in a car for that matter.  No coverage.<br><small>--<br>Toolmaster of La Grange.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-This-system-would-have-worse-latency-than-planes-using-3g-21655380</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 11:24:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: This system would have worse latency than planes using 3g</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-This-system-would-have-worse-latency-than-planes-using-3g-21655195</link>
<description><![CDATA[Karl Bode posted : Was thinking the same thing...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-This-system-would-have-worse-latency-than-planes-using-3g-21655195</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 10:41:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>This system would have worse latency than planes using 3g</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/This-system-would-have-worse-latency-than-planes-using-3g-21655133</link>
<description><![CDATA[ThrowDemsOut posted : If this would ever be implemented, it is kind of funny that trains on the ground would have worse latency than planes would have that are now implementing 3G systems.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/This-system-would-have-worse-latency-than-planes-using-3g-21655133</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 10:27:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

