 hottboiinnc ME
join:2003-10-15 Cleveland, OH | reply to djrobx Re: OMG
But for roughly $50 you could get a replacement if you have insurance to fix that. |
|
  djrobx
join:2000-05-31 Valencia, CA | reply to rahlquist Its also good for people who lost/broke their phone and are not eligible for an upgrade yet. -- AT&T U-Hearse Your funeral. Delivered.
|
|
 mrbueno
join:2002-08-03 US
| reply to ninjatutle This was done back in the late 80s and early 90s and was widely accepted and it worked well. I can imagine with the economy in a downturn this could potentially work well. While the typical American consumer perfers "owning" things, recently there is a backlash against contracts and people seem to like the "freedom" of not being bound to a contract.
It could be that or the complete lack of financial responsibility being displayed by people recently. |
|
  rahlquist Redeye
join:2001-10-30 Villa Rica, GA | reply to ninjatutle This could be a huge boon to homebrew cell phone developers. They can rent a platform and develop on it. Sweet. -- Fed Up With Stupidity?
Patentlystupid.com |
|
  mlong Premium join:2000-05-27 Parker, CO
·Qwest.net
| reply to RadioDoc I'd have to agree with you RadioDoc . People are willing to rent in order to keep up with technology or just try out all the phones. A look at forums like Howard Forums and you see some people go through phones as quickly as the come out.
I think this is a great idea and it was just a matter of time. -- Make money on the stuff you never use: »www.crowdrent.com |
|
 RadioDoc 58ef2c0 Premium,ExMod 2000-03 join:2000-05-11 | reply to ninjatutle Wanna bet? I would venture a guess that many of the fashionistas have a drawer full of ex-trendy phone toys. -- Toolmaster of La Grange. |
|
  ninjatutle Premium
join:2006-01-02 San Ramon, CA | Like just because it works with purses and shoes doesn't mean the concept would work for phones  |
|