<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Not Karl&#x27;s Fault in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r21671222</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 08:37:56 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 08:37:56 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Not Karl&#x27;s Fault</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21671222</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/428142"><b>KeysCapt</b></A> : That isn't Karl's fault ... if there are any inaccuracies, I'm the one who provided the info from the Wired.com article. It states, <i>"A powerful digital certificate that can be used to forge the identity of any website on the internet is in the hands of in international band of security researchers, thanks to a sophisticated attack on the ailing MD5 hash algorithm, a slip-up by Verisign, and about 200 PlayStation 3s."</i> Their original blog pointer to the story, now gone, included the <i>"we can hack anything"</i> suggestion.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21671222</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 17:04:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
