DesdinovaPremium
join:2003-01-26
Gaithersburg, MD | Hmmm... What I don't quite get from Comcast's perspective is their claim that using more than 250 gigs a month will create issues for all the users in my node/cluster. BUT if I upgrade to a business tier, my account will have no bandwidth caps and higher connection speeds even though I'm STILL running everything across the same node. If it's not an inconvenience THEN, why is it an inconvenience now? |
|
|
|
 funchordsHelloPremium,MVM
join:2001-03-11
Yarmouth Port, MA
kudos:5 | said by Desdinova:What I don't quite get from Comcast's perspective is their claim that using more than 250 gigs a month will create issues for all the users in my node/cluster. BUT if I upgrade to a business tier, my account will have no bandwidth caps and higher connection speeds even though I'm STILL running everything across the same node. If it's not an inconvenience THEN, why is it an inconvenience now? Exactly.
--
Robb Topolski -= funchords.com =- Hillsboro, Oregon -- KJ7RL
What you do at Christmas does not matter so much; What counts are the Christmas things you do all year through. |
|
 AlcoholPremium
join:2003-05-26
Climax, MI
kudos:3
 ·Comcast
| reply to Desdinova
said by Desdinova:What I don't quite get from Comcast's perspective is their claim that using more than 250 gigs a month will create issues for all the users in my node/cluster. BUT if I upgrade to a business tier, my account will have no bandwidth caps and higher connection speeds even though I'm STILL running everything across the same node. If it's not an inconvenience THEN, why is it an inconvenience now? It is obviously an excuse the lawyers and techs came up with. |
|
