<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;No Surprise&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/No-Surprise-21676476</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:12:16 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:12:16 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: No Surprise</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-No-Surprise-21677589</link>
<description><![CDATA[David posted : I didn't think they were mass pushing edge out the door but they were looking at retiring it. You are right I think. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-No-Surprise-21677589</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 23:53:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>No Surprise</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/No-Surprise-21676476</link>
<description><![CDATA[PolarBear03 posted : This is typical of most companies. When new technology comes out, it starts costing too much to support old technology. Sometimes some customers get screwed because they don't want to or can't upgrade (OnStar, anyone?), but it's collateral damage.<br><br>In this case, however, I think it's premature. There's simply too many EDGE users out there and too little 3G coverage for them to start phasing EDGE out. I understand that if they migrate more users to the 3G network, they can further deploy it, but as Karl said, "...there's still a lot of traditional 2G/EDGE customers under long-term contract out there (including first gen iPhone, RAZR and Blackberry users)..."<br><small>--<br>I'm one of those people you can't take out of context. You have to see the whole me before I begin to make any sense.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/No-Surprise-21676476</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 19:12:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

