republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


adisor19

join:2004-10-11
Reviews:
·Acanac

reply to jaminus

Re: I don't understand

said by jaminus:

Signals on the 850mhz band tend to work better for mobile users than signals on the 1900mhz band. While the output power for EDGE signals is the same on both bands, 1900mhz is a shorter wavelength and so the signal doesn't travel long distances from cell towers.

But on the flipside, 1900mhz signals penetrates buildings more easily than 850mhz signals, so mobile users in dense buildings with lots of metallic structural elements might actually notice better coverage thanks to the shift of EDGE from 850mhz to 1900mhz.
Wrong. WRONG. WRONG !!!.

850Mhz penetrates bulidings easyer because over the same distances, the vibration is more then redused by half. As a result, it has half the chance of being absorbed by a foreign object.

The downside is that it carries half the data that 1900Mhz would due to being only half the vibrations over the same distance.

Also, i'm using very simplistic words to describe this...

Adi

Markie

join:2003-07-26
Kalispell, MT

Sadly you're wrong too... 10MHz of spectrum is 10Mhz (as an example) whether 450-460 or 850-860 or 1900-1910 or 5900-5910 (just as examples, those aren't exact real assignments).

There IS more available at higher frequencies as lower frequencies have already been called for, though Feb 17th a ton of 700MHz spectrum is being freed up, most of it going to Verizon and AT&T (yay for the big getting bigger )

The basic idea of a shorter wavelength being blocked more easily IS correct though.


Thursday, 31-May 12:18:17 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics