Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Tech and Talk » Technical » Digital Imaging Technology » Digital print size?
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
734
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
Post a:
Post a:
Big arsed digital picture frame »
« SLR review of the Tamron 18-270mm  
AuthorAll Replies


Fobulous
Premium
join:2002-08-14
Missouri City, TX
clubs:
·Comcast

Digital print size?

Hello all,

I took some sharp pictures of my wife using the L of D90 4288x2848. I spent some time Googling and found that with 4288x2848 one would need to get 36x24 prints? Is this correct?

I got the calculation from:

4288/300 (300dpi)=14.29cm x 2.54= 36"
2848/300 (300dpi)=9.49cm x 2.54= 24"

It's quiet pricey to get prints like that! Would it be sufficient if i can crop it to 11x14? The smallest resolution i can do with the D90 is 2144x1424 which would mean a 18x12 can i use that to make 11x14 as well?

I guess any online digital print place would do that for me e.g. adormapix.com which is still having the $1.99 for 11x14 sale!

TIA!
--
After one look at this planet any visitor from outer space would say "I want to see the manager."
- William S. Burroughs


glossy8x10

@tmodns.net

the printing setup of any printer will scale the image file down to whatever print size you like.

try 8x10 glossy paper in your own printer,
with the printer settings put to maximum quality and set to glossy paper. (close enough for most folks, but inkjet ink smears with water.)

you are right about the mailorder places for bigger prints, they scale it down for you.

alternatively, many walmart/cvs etc places have photo kiosks, into which you can cable the camera or insert the mem card. then right away in a few minutes you can get photo-paper 4"x6" prints for $0.29 or 8" x 10" for ~$6.


reub2000
Premium
join:2001-12-28
Evanston, IL
reply to Fobulous
I'm not sure where you got 300dpi, but the resolution is determined by the printer. Even so, images that don't contain text can be scaled down pretty easily.
--
My pbase gallery


Willy
Premium
join:2000-09-24
USA
·Verizon FIOS
·Optimum Online

reply to Fobulous
I'm don't understand your math.

4288/300 (300dpi)=14.29 in. cm x 2.54= 36"
2848/300 (300dpi)=9.49 in. cm x 2.54= 24"

To print 36" X 24" at 300dpi you need 10,800 X 7,200.

With that said, 300 DPI is generally considered what you need to get prints that are visibly indistinguishable from prints made from film.
That number is way over rated, just a rule of thumb, and doesn't take anything else into consideration.

Don't let that stop you from getting a print made with a lower resolution. (Price is something else though)

As for printing to a different size paper, you can print to any print size you want.
You will just have to crop or trim off something from the length or width to make it fit.


Gemologist
Premium
join:2001-11-15
USA
clubs:

reply to Fobulous
Simple solution...
»ekot.dk/programmer/JPEGCrops/

JPEGCrops will crop your image down to the desired printing size and takes care of everything for you. Then just print or send off to printers.
--
Images are Copyrighted and use is NOT
permitted.


reub2000
Premium
join:2001-12-28
Evanston, IL

reply to Willy
A professor told me that the image dpi should be a fraction of the resolution that you set the printer to. So for example, if you set the printer to 1440dpi, then you can set your image at 360, 288, and 240 among other resolutions.
--
My pbase gallery


Willy
Premium
join:2000-09-24
USA
·Verizon FIOS
·Optimum Online

said by reub2000 See Profile :

A professor told me that the image dpi should be a fraction of the resolution that you set the printer to. So for example, if you set the printer to 1440dpi, then you can set your image at 360, 288, and 240 among other resolutions.
Never heard that before.
What did he say the reason was?


reub2000
Premium
join:2001-12-28
Evanston, IL

said by Willy See Profile :

said by reub2000 See Profile :

A professor told me that the image dpi should be a fraction of the resolution that you set the printer to. So for example, if you set the printer to 1440dpi, then you can set your image at 360, 288, and 240 among other resolutions.
Never heard that before.
What did he say the reason was?
This was not the teacher to question. He collected PSDs from students so that he could make sure that they contained the right adjustment layers. I got the label of "troublemaker" for bringing up too many questions.
--
My pbase gallery


Willy
Premium
join:2000-09-24
USA
Asking questions in class makes you a troublemaker?

Not much of an instructor was he?


McSummation
Mmmm, Zeebas Are Tastee.
Premium,MVM
join:2003-08-13
Round Rock, TX
·AT&T Southwest

said by Willy See Profile :

Not much of an instructor was he?
He may have been an "instructor", but he was not a teacher.

If you use multiples of the dpi, or whole factors, then the printer doesn't need to go through the "resample" algorithm, which tends to blur the image.


Willy
Premium
join:2000-09-24
USA
  Thanks for the clarification.


reub2000
Premium
join:2001-12-28
Evanston, IL


1 edit
reply to Fobulous
The label came from a staff member, and the teacher said that I had reputation that followed me around. The "troublemaker" thing was more of a joke. And by questioning things, I mean not doing things the way the teacher tells us. I'd do stuff like adding a color balance adjustment layer when the teacher told us to make adjustments with a curves adjustment layer. Wow, I have strayed far off topic.

Also, remember that these sizes are for the actual images, not the paper. Consider what type of border you want, if any.
--
My pbase gallery
-
Forums » Tech and Talk » Technical » Digital Imaging TechnologyBig arsed digital picture frame »
« SLR review of the Tamron 18-270mm  


Thursday, 03-Dec 16:00:53 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [162] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [130] Avast Antivirus Has Gone Mad
· [103] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [81] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [80] Comcast Makes NBC Universal Acquisition Official
· [70] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
· [64] Broadband Killed The Game Console
· [56] Sprint Defuses GPS Privacy Media Bomb
· [55] Rogers Unveils The ISP Dream Model
· [47] ACTA: Global Three Strikes
Most people now reading
· False positive in Avast! or is it real? [Security]
· Warrior tank seem underpowered these days [World of Warcraft]
· [Rant] Disrespect of PTO [Rants, Raves, and Praise]
· [TWC] Audio/Video outage in Brooklyn [Time Warner Cable TV/Voice]
· Linux is terrorist - according to MS... [All Things Unix]
· Bell Entertainment (IPTV) Goes Live in my Condo = DC's [TekSavvy]
· Many Sites Unreachable [Rogers]
· [ Classes] 3.2.2 Rogue [World of Warcraft]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Google Adds 9 More Cities To Street View [Canadian Chat]