<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: 6to4 router vs 6to4 relay router&#x27; in forum &#x27;IPv6&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-6to4-router-vs-6to4-relay-router-21625033</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 15:17:21 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 15:17:21 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: 6to4 router vs 6to4 relay router</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-6to4-router-vs-6to4-relay-router-21683864</link>
<description><![CDATA[Datlev posted : Probably the most complete reference is the RFC's at this point.  Here is a snippet from RFC 3056: (&raquo;<A HREF="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3056" >tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3056</A>)<br>Also take a look at RFC 3068:  (&raquo;<A HREF="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3068" >tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3068</A>)<br><br>1.1. Terminology<br><br>   The terminology of [IPV6] applies to this document.<br><br>   6to4 pseudo-interface:<br>         6to4 encapsulation of IPv6 packets inside IPv4 packets occurs<br>         at a point that is logically equivalent to an IPv6 interface,<br>         with the link layer being the IPv4 unicast network.  This point<br>         is referred to as a pseudo-interface.  Some implementors may<br>         treat it exactly like any other interface and others may treat<br>         it like a tunnel end-point.<br><br>   6to4 prefix:<br>         an IPv6 prefix constructed according to the rule in Section 2<br>         below.<br><br>   6to4 address:  an IPv6 address constructed using a 6to4 prefix.<br><br>   Native IPv6 address:  an IPv6 address constructed using another type<br>         of prefix than 6to4.<br><br>   6to4 router (or 6to4 border router):<br>         an IPv6 router supporting a 6to4 pseudo-interface.  It is<br>         normally the border router between an IPv6 site and a wide-area<br>         IPv4 network.<br><br>   6to4 host:<br>         an IPv6 host which happens to have at least one 6to4 address.<br>         In all other respects it is a standard IPv6 host.<br><br>   Note: an IPv6 node may in some cases use a 6to4 address for a<br>   configured tunnel.  Such a node may function as an IPv6 host using a<br>   6to4 address on its configured tunnel interface, and it may also<br>   serve as a IPv6 router for other hosts via a 6to4 pseudo-interface,<br>   but these are distinct functions.<br><br>   6to4 site:<br>         a site running IPv6 internally using 6to4 addresses, therefore<br>         containing at least one 6to4 host and at least one 6to4 router.<br><br> <br>   Relay router:<br>         a 6to4 router configured to support transit routing between<br>         6to4 addresses and native IPv6 addresses.<br><br>   6to4 exterior routing domain:<br>         a routing domain interconnecting a set of 6to4 routers and<br>         relay routers.  It is distinct from an IPv6 site's interior<br>         routing domain, and distinct from all native IPv6 exterior<br>         routing domains.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-6to4-router-vs-6to4-relay-router-21683864</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 11:05:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>6to4 router vs 6to4 relay router</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/6to4-router-vs-6to4-relay-router-21625033</link>
<description><![CDATA[hjazz posted : Hi,<br><br>I'm a bit confused about the difference between a 6to4 router and a 6to4 relay router.<br><br>I understand that a 6to4 routers are used between 6to4 sites, while 6to4 relay routers are used between native IPv6 sites and 6to4 sites. However, what exactly is a 6to4 site and a native IPv6 site? Don't both type of routers forward IPv6 packets over IPv4 networks, which means both routers work in a IPv6 network? Or does the difference only lies in the IP addresses used, i.e. 6to4 routers accept only 6to4 source and destination addresses (2002::/16 prefixes) and 6to4 relay routers accept only 6to4 source/native IPv6 dest (2001::/16 prefixes) addresses and native IPv6 source/6to4 dest addresses? If that's the case, why have the distinction? Why not just use 6to4 routers?<br><br>Also, looking at the diagram in<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.ipv6tf.org/index.php?page=using/connectivity/6to4" >www.ipv6tf.org/index.php?page=us&middot;&middot;&middot;ity/6to4</A><br>what is a IPv6 island? Is it a private IPv6 network setup by say, organizations and schools?<br><br>Thank you.<br><br>Regards,<br>Rayne]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/6to4-router-vs-6to4-relay-router-21625033</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 02:29:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

